Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;27(2):e70028.
doi: 10.1111/codi.70028.

The impact of surgeon speciality on surgical outcomes following colorectal resection for endometriosis

Affiliations

The impact of surgeon speciality on surgical outcomes following colorectal resection for endometriosis

Yosef Nasseri et al. Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: An estimated 5%-25% of women with endometriosis have colorectal involvement. Colorectal resection is the most suitable surgical management for cases with large bowel infiltration. However, this method is also associated with the highest rate of postoperative complications. Data focusing on surgeon speciality and surgical outcomes are currently limited. The aim of this work was to evaluate the surgical characteristics and short-term postoperative outcomes following colorectal resection for endometriosis according to surgeon speciality.

Method: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we included women who underwent colorectal resection for endometriosis between 2012 and 2020. Surgeries by general/colorectal surgeons were compared with those by gynaecological surgeons. The primary outcome was major complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results: Among 745 colorectal resections, 82.3% were performed by general/colorectal surgeons and 17.7% by gynaecologists. Racial and ethnic characteristics differed between groups, but other baseline characteristics were comparable. General/colorectal surgeons performed fewer minimally invasive surgeries (29.9% vs. 58.3%, p < 0.001). General/colorectal surgery cases had lower rates of any postoperative complications and minor complications (14.8% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.001; 10.1% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.001), while major complication rates were similar. Multivariable regression showed no association between major complications and surgical speciality. In a propensity score-matched analysis, no significant differences were found between the two cohorts.

Conclusion: Most colorectal resections are performed by general/colorectal surgeons while a minimally invasive approach is more common among gynaecologists. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups after adjusting for confounding variables. This suggests considering a multidisciplinary or dual surgery team approach to deep infiltrative endometriosis requiring bowel resection.

Keywords: NSQIP database; colorectal surgery; gynaecological surgery; multidisciplinary approach; multivariable analysis; pelvic endometriosis; postoperative complications; propensity score matching; rectal resection; surgical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364:1789–1799.
    1. Balla A, Quaresima S, Subiela JD, Shalaby M, Petrella G, Sileri P. Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:835–847.
    1. Daraï E, Cohen J, Ballester M. Colorectal endometriosis and fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;209:86–94.
    1. Burney RO, Giudice LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:511–519.
    1. Tosti C, Pinzauti S, Santulli P, Chapron C, Petraglia F. Pathogenetic mechanisms of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22:1053–1059.

LinkOut - more resources