Benjamin's translation as dialectical abduction: a novel epistemic framework for diagnostic hypothesizing
- PMID: 39951216
- DOI: 10.1007/s11017-025-09698-2
Benjamin's translation as dialectical abduction: a novel epistemic framework for diagnostic hypothesizing
Abstract
In this paper I present a novel understanding of diagnostic hypothesis that draws ideas from Walter Benjamin's work on translation. My framework originates from previous literature that aligns diagnostic hypothesis with Peircean 'abduction.' I argue that the abductive step, rather than being an inference to the best explanation, is a strategic conjecture that is simultaneously interrogative and interpretive. While Peirce places the burden of interpretation solely on semiotic analysis, I develop a form of dialectical abduction that draws on Benjamin's distinction between semiotic and mimetic faculties of language. I further argue that while all abduction functions through language interpretation, diagnostic abduction works not simply as interpretation but is more accurately described as the translation of patient narrative and clinician investigation into the language of clinical medicine. I then analyze diagnostic translation within the dialectical framework for translation described by Benjamin, and use this model to develop suggestions for a methodology of clinical abduction.
Keywords: Abduction; Diagnosis; Epistemology; Translation.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Kyriacou, Demetrios N. 2004. Evidence-based medical decision making: Deductive versus inductive logical thinking. Academic Emergency Medicine. 11: 670–671.
-
- Bowen, Judith L. 2006. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine. 355: 2217–2225.
-
- Duca, Nicholas S., and Susan Glod. 2019. Bridging the gap between the classroom and the clerkship: A clinical reasoning curriculum for third-year medical students. MedEdPortal. 15: 10800.
-
- Peirce Charles S. 1960. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Wiess (Eds.) In: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge 1-6
-
- Corazza, G.R., M.V. Lenti, and P.D. Howdle. 2021. Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: A practical reappraisal. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 16 (2): 273–279.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources