Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 10;65(5):2180-2190.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02296. Epub 2025 Feb 14.

The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks

Affiliations
Review

The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks

Christian Kramer et al. J Chem Inf Model. .

Abstract

Computational tools for structure-based drug design (SBDD) are widely used in drug discovery and can provide valuable insights to advance projects in an efficient and cost-effective manner. However, despite the importance of SBDD to the field, the underlying methodologies and techniques have many limitations. In particular, binding pose and activity predictions (P-AP) are still not consistently reliable. We strongly believe that a limiting factor is the lack of a widely accepted and established community benchmarking process that independently assesses the performance and drives the development of methods, similar to the CASP benchmarking challenge for protein structure prediction. Here, we provide an overview of P-AP, unblinded benchmarking data sets, and blinded benchmarking initiatives (concluded and ongoing) and offer a perspective on learnings and the future of the field. To accelerate a breakthrough on the development of novel P-AP methods, it is necessary for the community to establish and support a long-term benchmark challenge that provides nonbiased training/test/validation sets, a systematic independent validation, and a forum for scientific discussions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. van Montfort RLM; Workman P Structure-Based Drug Design: Aiming for a Perfect Fit. Essays Biochem. 2017, 61 (5), 431–437. 10.1042/EBC20170052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bissantz C; Kuhn B; Stahl M A Medicinal Chemist’s Guide to Molecular Interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53 (14), 5061–5084. 10.1021/jm100112j. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017, 57 (12), 2911–2937. 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00564. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feng M; Heinzelmann G; Gilson MK Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations Improve Enrichment of Actives in Virtual Compound Screening. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12 (1), 13640. 10.1038/s41598-022-17480-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang L; Wu Y; Deng Y; Kim B; Pierce L; Krilov G; Lupyan D; Robinson S; Dahlgren MK; Greenwood J; Romero DL; Masse C; Knight JL; Steinbrecher T; Beuming T; Damm W; Harder E; Sherman W; Brewer M; Wester R; Murcko M; Frye L; Farid R; Lin T; Mobley DL; Jorgensen WL; Berne BJ; Friesner RA; Abel R Accurate and Reliable Prediction of Relative Ligand Binding Potency in Prospective Drug Discovery by Way of a Modern Free-Energy Calculation Protocol and Force Field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (7), 2695–2703. 10.1021/ja512751q. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources