Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: the PEXITY study
- PMID: 39953171
- PMCID: PMC11828810
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03104-0
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: the PEXITY study
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVR) has gained increasing acceptance for the treatment of patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse (RP), but literature on follow-up of at least 10 years is scarce. We studied recurrence rate, long-term functional results and quality of life in patients who had LVR for RP more than 12 years ago.
Method: The study population consisted of patients who could be contacted among the 175 who had undergone LVR for RP and whose short- and medium-term outcomes were published in 2012. We studied the long-term recurrence rate (Kaplan-Meier), functional outcome (Wexner and ODS scores), quality of life (EuroQol) and satisfaction of the patient through clinical examination(s), specific scores and questionnaires.
Results: Of the 175 patients, 14 patients had exclusion criteria, 57 had died, and 42 were lost to follow-up, leaving 62 patients for analysis. Seventeen patients presented with a recurrence (10.5%) at the 10-year follow-up. The only statistically significant risk factor for recurrence was recurrent RP (HR = 11.5 (2.54-52.2), P = 0.002). The median faecal incontinence score was 4 (0-10) and significantly worse in patients who had a recurrence [12 (7-13) vs 3 (0-9); P = 0.016]. The median obstructive defaecation score was 6 (3-12). The median quality of life score was 7 (6-8). Most patients who presented with a recurrence said they would undergo the operation again and recommended it, as would patients with no recurrence.
Conclusion: LVR for RP is a safe and efficient technique with sustainable long-term results that shows long-term efficacy at > 10 years after the operation.
Keywords: Full-thickness rectal prolapse; laparoscopic ventral rectopexy; long-term functional results; prolapse recurrence; quality of life.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: None of the authors has a conflict of interest concerning this work.
Figures
References
-
- D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505 - PubMed
-
- Reche F, Faucheron JL (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is the gold standard treatment for rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 19:565–566 - PubMed
-
- Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 12:526–532 - PubMed
-
- Jarry J, Moreau Gaudry A, Long JA, Chipon E, Cinquin P, Faucheron JL (2013) Miniaturized robotic laparoscope-holder for rectopexy: first results of a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:351–355 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
