Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 14;29(1):68.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03104-0.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: the PEXITY study

Affiliations

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: the PEXITY study

M Barra et al. Tech Coloproctol. .

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVR) has gained increasing acceptance for the treatment of patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse (RP), but literature on follow-up of at least 10 years is scarce. We studied recurrence rate, long-term functional results and quality of life in patients who had LVR for RP more than 12 years ago.

Method: The study population consisted of patients who could be contacted among the 175 who had undergone LVR for RP and whose short- and medium-term outcomes were published in 2012. We studied the long-term recurrence rate (Kaplan-Meier), functional outcome (Wexner and ODS scores), quality of life (EuroQol) and satisfaction of the patient through clinical examination(s), specific scores and questionnaires.

Results: Of the 175 patients, 14 patients had exclusion criteria, 57 had died, and 42 were lost to follow-up, leaving 62 patients for analysis. Seventeen patients presented with a recurrence (10.5%) at the 10-year follow-up. The only statistically significant risk factor for recurrence was recurrent RP (HR = 11.5 (2.54-52.2), P = 0.002). The median faecal incontinence score was 4 (0-10) and significantly worse in patients who had a recurrence [12 (7-13) vs 3 (0-9); P = 0.016]. The median obstructive defaecation score was 6 (3-12). The median quality of life score was 7 (6-8). Most patients who presented with a recurrence said they would undergo the operation again and recommended it, as would patients with no recurrence.

Conclusion: LVR for RP is a safe and efficient technique with sustainable long-term results that shows long-term efficacy at > 10 years after the operation.

Keywords: Full-thickness rectal prolapse; laparoscopic ventral rectopexy; long-term functional results; prolapse recurrence; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: None of the authors has a conflict of interest concerning this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participant selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis estimating the probability of recurrence over time

References

    1. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505 - PubMed
    1. Reche F, Faucheron JL (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is the gold standard treatment for rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 19:565–566 - PubMed
    1. Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I (2010) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 12:526–532 - PubMed
    1. Faucheron JL, Trilling B, Girard E, Sage PY, Barbois S, Reche F (2015) Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: technical and functional results. World J Gastroenterol 21:5049–5055 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarry J, Moreau Gaudry A, Long JA, Chipon E, Cinquin P, Faucheron JL (2013) Miniaturized robotic laparoscope-holder for rectopexy: first results of a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:351–355 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources