Global lens of Willems' method for dental age estimation: where we are and where we are going - umbrella review
- PMID: 39954055
- DOI: 10.1007/s00414-025-03424-2
Global lens of Willems' method for dental age estimation: where we are and where we are going - umbrella review
Abstract
This umbrella review aimed to evaluate the evidence behind the Willems method for dental age estimation and detect methodological limitations in the existing systematic reviews. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR), with the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023487745). Seven databases, including grey literature sources, were searched (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, Web of Science, Open Grey and Open Access Theses and Dissertations). Systematic reviews of cross-sectional studies on the Willems method were included. Two calibrated reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, quality assessment (AMSTAR-2) and risk of bias (ROBIS). Five systematic reviews published between 2017 and 2022 were included. Combined sample sizes ranged from 9347 to 17,741 individuals aged 2.2 to 18 years. Meta-analyses reported minor overestimations in dental age, with differences varying by sex and ethnicity. However, significant methodological shortcomings were identified, such as lack of protocol registration, limited search strategies, and inadequate assessment of the risk of bias. All systematic reviews were rated as critically low quality and with a high risk of bias. The Willems method was deemed appropriate for dental age estimation by most studies, but methodological limitations of existing systematic reviews underscore the need for more rigorous research and improved standards.
Keywords: Age; Children; Forensic dentistry; Radiograph; Tooth.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Human ethics and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Clinical trial number: Not applicable. Competing interest: The authors declare that they do not have competing interests related to this study.
References
-
- Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:211–227 - PubMed
-
- Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M, Kihara E, Thevissen P, Nyamunga D, Fieuws S, Kanini M, Willems G (2021) Validating dental age estimation in Kenyan black children and adolescents using the Willems method. Med Sci Law 61:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802420977379 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Metsäniitty M, Waltimo-Sirén J, Ranta H, Fieuws S, Thevissen P et al (2018) Dental age estimation in Somali children using the Willems model. Int J Legal Med 132:1779–1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1926-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Machado MVF, Soares MQS, Baz MSA, Junqueira JLCA, Franco A (2022) Large sample-sized study on dental development of children treated at the Central Dental Clinic (OCEx) of the Brazilian Army. Clin Oral Invest 26:5439–5447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04511-z - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources