Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 3;22(3):1518-1528.
doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c01232. Epub 2025 Feb 15.

Novel FAP-Targeted Heptamethine Cyanines for NIRF Imaging Applications

Affiliations

Novel FAP-Targeted Heptamethine Cyanines for NIRF Imaging Applications

Rebecca Rizzo et al. Mol Pharm. .

Abstract

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a pan-cancer target that is useful for imaging, ideally all epithelial cancers. This work aimed to develop, characterize, and validate two novel FAP-targeted probes for optical imaging, both in vitro and in vivo. IRDye800CW and FNIRTag heptamethine cyanines were conjugated to the NH precursor of the well-known FAP inhibitor FAPI-46, which is widely employed in nuclear medicine. In addition to synthesis, the dyes were characterized in terms of physicochemical properties, biodistribution, and imaging performances in a breast cancer tumor model. FAPI-FNIRTag showed a stronger fluorescence and higher photostability compared to FAPI-IRDye800CW. Notably, both compounds exhibited strong tumor accumulation in TUBO breast cancer-bearing mice 24 h postadministration, suggesting potential for further investigation as fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) agents.

Keywords: FAP; breast cancer; heptamethine cyanines; near-infrared fluorescence imaging; optical imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Synthetic protocol for FAPI-IRDye800CW and FAPI-FNIRTag.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra. Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra in PBS (pH = 7.4) of (A) FAPI-FNIRTag (λex = 740 nm, λem = 788 nm) and (B) FAPI-IRDye800CW (λex = 730 nm, λem = 790 nm).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fluorescence linearity and phantom imaging. (A) Average radiance efficiency comparison between FAPI-FNIRTag and FAPI-IRDye800CW at different concentrations (IVIS measurements and phantom imaging). (B) Fluorescence emission comparison (cps) between FAPI-FNIRTag and FAPI-IRDye800CW based on fluorimeter measurements (λex = 740 nm for FAPI-FNIRTag, λex = 730 nm for FAPI-IRDye800CW). (C) Phantom imaging comparison between FAPI-FNIRTag (on the left) and FAPI-IRDye800CW (on the right) (λex = 740 nm, λem = 790 nm).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photostability. (A) FAPI-IRDye800CW excitation spectra before and after irradiation. (B) FAPI-IRDye800CW emission spectra before and after irradiation. (C) FAPI-FNIRTag excitation spectra before and after irradiation. (D) FAPI-FNIRTag emission spectra before and after irradiation. (E) The time course of normalized fluorescence intensity decreases after irradiation (2 h, every 60 s) for FAPI-FNIRTag and FAPI-IRDye800CW.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Serum albumin binding. Albumin binding data after 1 h incubation ([dye] = 0.15 μM, PBS pH 7.4) at RT. (A) FAPI-FNIRTag. (B) FAPI-IRDye800CW.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Fluorescent dye uptake on FAP-expressing cells. Fluorescence emission on FAP-expressing cells of dyes incubated at 0.5 μM (monochromatic histograms), dyes together with 100× excess of competitor (unconjugated FAPI-46) (angled patterned histograms), without any dyes (gray), and dyes on no-FAP-expressing cells (horizontal patterned histograms). Dot plots of acquired representative samples are fully reported in the Supporting Information. Data were shown as means ± SD **** p < 0.0001 (n = 3) t-test (α = 0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Flow cytometry results of FAP-expressing cells in TUBO tumors. (A) Percentage of FAP-expressing cells in live cells extracted from TUBO tumors in Balb/c mice. Control results refer to unstained FAP-expressing cells. Data were shown as means ± SD *** p = 0.0005 (n = 4) t-test (α = 0,05). (B) Dot plot of the TUBO tumor sample (BalB/c mice), gating on live cells.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Immunohistochemical evaluation of excised tumor tissues from TUBO tumor-bearing Balb/C mice. Brown signals correspond to anti-FAP staining; nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. Immunohistochemical staining of excised tumor tissue in the absence of primary antibody anti-FAP above and immunohistochemical staining of excised tumor tissue (anti-FAP primary antibody) below.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Fluorescence imaging. (A) Kinetics of in vivo average radiance efficiency found for tumor tissue and (B) muscle (background). (C) Tumor-to-background ratio. * p = 0.0297 t-test (α = 0.05) (n = 3). (D) In vivo fluorescence imaging of TUBO tumor-bearing mice intravenously injected with 5 nmol of FAPI-IRDye800CW and FAPI-FNIRTag 24 h-postinjection (white arrows indicate the tumors; green arrow indicates the kidneys). (E) In vivo fluorescence imaging of TUBO tumor-bearing mice intravenously injected with 5 nmol of FAPI-FNIRTag at different time points. (F) In vivo fluorescence imaging of TUBO tumor-bearing mice intravenously injected with 5 nmol of FAPI-IRDye800CW at different time points.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Ex vivo biodistribution study. (A) Ex vivo fluorescence imaging of the main organs excised from TUBO tumor-bearing mice i.v. injected with 5 nmol of FAPI-FNIRTag or FAPI-IRDye800CW (1: muscle, 2: tumor, 3: heart, 4: lung, 5: liver, 6: spleen, 7: pancreas, 8: intestine, 9: kidneys, 10: blood). (B) Biodistribution for FAPI-FNIRTag and FAPI-IRDye800CW (5 nmol) in TUBO tumor-bearing athymic mice 24 h postinjection. p = 0.0161 for FAPI-FNIRTag tumor/muscle; p = 0.0127 for FAPI-IRDye800CW tumor/muscle; p = 0.0030 for kidneys comparison; and p = 0.0014 for liver comparison. (t-test α = 0.05). (C) Percentage of dye-bound cells in live cells extracted from TUBO tumors in nude mice excised 24 h after i.v. injection of 5 nmol of FAPI-IRDye800CW or FAPI-FNIRTag. p = 0.024 (t-test α = 0.05).

References

    1. Xin L.; Gao J.; Zheng Z.; Chen Y.; Lv S.; Zhao Z.; Yu C.; Yang X.; Zhang R. Fibroblast Activation Protein-α as a Target in the Bench-to-Bedside Diagnosis and Treatment of Tumors: A Narrative Review. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 64818710.3389/fonc.2021.648187. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calais J. FAP: The next billion dollar nuclear theranostics target?. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 163–165. 10.2967/jnumed.119.241232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hua X.; Yu L.; Huang X.; Liao Z.; Xian Q. Expression and role of fibroblast activation protein-alpha in microinvasive breast carcinoma. Diagn. Pathol. 2011, 6, 11110.1186/1746-1596-6-111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kratochwil C.; Flechsig P.; Lindner T.; Abderrahim L.; Altmann A.; Mier W.; Adeberg S.; Rathke H.; Röhrich M.; Winter H.; Plinkert P. K.; Marme F.; Lang M.; Kauczor H. U.; Jäger D.; Debus J.; Haberkorn U.; Giesel F. L. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 801–805. 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sandberg T. P.; Stuart M. P. M. E.; Oosting J.; Tollenaar R. A. E. M.; Sier C. F. M.; Mesker W. E. Increased expression of cancer-associated fibroblast markers at the invasive front and its association with tumor-stroma ratio in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019, 19, 28410.1186/s12885-019-5462-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed