Phase 1 study of lintuzumab-Ac225 combined with CLAG-M salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia
- PMID: 39955432
- DOI: 10.1038/s41375-025-02528-3
Phase 1 study of lintuzumab-Ac225 combined with CLAG-M salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia
Abstract
Lintuzumab-Ac255 is a humanized anti-CD33 antibody linked to Actinium-225 delivering high-energy alpha-particles to leukemia cells, inciting double-strand DNA breaks and cell death. This phase 1 study assessed the safety and efficacy of lintuzumab-Ac225 after CLAG-M salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). Primary objectives were determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and safety. Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, 21 patients were enrolled sequentially into 4 cohorts to receive a lintuzumab-Ac225 infusion (0.25-1.0 µCi/kg) 7 ( + 2) days after CLAG-M (days 1-6); 5 additional patients received the RP2D. Of evaluable patients, 86.7% had high-risk disease. The MTD and RP2D was 0.75 µCi/kg. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (65.4%) and decreased white blood cells (50%). The composite complete remission (CRc) rates (CR/CRi) were 56.6% overall, 50% in patients with mutated TP53, and 38.5% in prior venetoclax-treated patients. Measurable residual disease (MRD)-negativity was achieved in 8 of 12 responders. Among all patients (n = 26), estimated 2-year OS was 23.1% (95% CI, 9.4-40.3) and estimated 1-year PFS was 30.8% (95% CI, 14.6-48.5). Lintuzumab-Ac225 plus CLAG-M was well tolerated with expected, manageable toxicities, while yielding deep and meaningful responses in high-risk R/R AML patients.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: S.M.A. received consultancy fees from Incyte Inc, Servier, and Soba; and received research funding from Actinium, AltruBio, and Incyte. G.S.G.M. received consultancy and speaker bureau fees from Amgen; speaker bureau fees from Rigel; advisory board fees from Pfizer, BMS, Autolus, Syndax and Stemline; and research funding from LOXO/Lilly, Zentalis, Schrodinger, and Merck. M.H. received consultancy, research funding and speaker bureau fees from ADC Therapeutics; research funding from Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and Astellas Pharma; consultancy and speaker bureau fees from Kite Pharma; speaker bureau fees from Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca and BeiGene; and consultancy fees from Omeros, BMS, Genmab, CRISPR, Allovir, Caribou, Autolus, Forte Biosciences, AbbVie, and Byondis. L.C.M. received consultancy fees from Disc Medicine. K.S.M., L.R., and K.G. have no conflicts of interest to disclose. A.G.D., M.M.C., K.L.L., M.R., U.S., and M.V. are currently employed by Actinium Pharmaceuticals and hold equity in this publicly traded company.
References
-
- Koenig K, Mims A, Levis MJ, Horowitz MM. The changing landscape of treatment in acute myeloid leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020;40:1–12.
-
- Atallah EL. Why isn’t there a one-size-fits-all approach for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia? Insights into different variables for decision-making. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2021;34:101240. - PubMed
-
- Chen X, Xie H, Wood BL, Walter RB, Pagel JM, Becker PS, et al. Relation of clinical response and minimal residual disease and their prognostic impact on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1258–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
