Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02495-4.

Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions

Affiliations
Review

Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions

Krista E Cooksey et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Patient engagement in research is gaining traction as an international standard, and often requirement, of many health research funding agencies. Drivers of this increase include patient interest, increased attention to and recognition of the value of patients' voices in research, and more patients leading or partnering in the conduct research. Patient engagement includes collaborating and providing insights into research question and study design, and may extend to the publication process. When patients contribute to publications, they can bring unique perspectives that may enhance the impact, reach, and utility of the research in real-world contexts. Currently, there is limited systematic guidance to support patient partners as they navigate this complex publication process. As a result, it can be difficult for patient partners to understand when and how they should be included as authors, how to collaborate in the writing process, and how to complete mandatory tasks during the submission process. In this paper, we review barriers and facilitators within existing publication practices and offer recommendations to ensure that the scientific publication process is more transparent and accessible for patient partners.

Keywords: Co-authorship; Co-production; Collaboration; Patient engagement; Patient partnership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This manuscript does not report on any human subjects data, thus there is no ethics approval needed. Consent for publication: N/A. Competing interests: Dr. Politi was a consultant for UCB Biopharma in 2022 and EpiQ in 2023 on topics unrelated to this manuscript.

References

    1. Lauzon-Schnittka J, Audette-Chapdelaine S, Boutin D, et al. The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Res Involv Engagem. 2022;8(1):55. 10.1186/s40900-022-00388-0. [published Online First: 2022/10/04]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards DP, Birnie KA, Eubanks K, et al. Guidance on authorship with and acknowledgement of patient partners in patient-oriented research. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:38. 10.1186/s40900-020-00213-6. [published Online First: 2020/07/09]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chudyk AM, Stoddard R, Duhamel TA, et al. Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):24. 10.1186/s12961-024-01106-w. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Easley J, Wassersug R, Matthias S, et al. Patient Engagement in Health Research: perspectives from patient participants. Curr Oncol (Toronto Ont). 2023;30(3):2770–80. 10.3390/curroncol30030210. [published Online First: 2023/03/29]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engagement FAQs Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. [Available from: https://www.pcori.org/funding-opportunities/applicant-and-awardee-resour.... accessed 11/5 2024.

LinkOut - more resources