Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):242.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05599-x.

The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire

Affiliations

The use of magnification in endodontic treatments by endodontists: results of a questionnaire

Gülsen Kiraz et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study to investigate the accessibility and frequency of use of magnification systems in endodontics and to evaluate the economic and logistical factors.

Methods: A survey comprising of 34 questions, created in Survey Monkey, was sent to 874 clinicians. The survey consisted of three main sections: demographic information, the use of magnification systems, and financial factors. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were performed.

Results: Of the participants, 42.3% were endodontists, and 57.7% were postgraduate students in endodontics. Nearly 26.1%, 32.7%, and 41.1% reported using a dental operating microscope (DOM), a loupe, and no magnification system, respectively. When asked how long it would take to recoup the cost of the DOM, considering additional charges or patient preferences, the most common response (40%) was 1-2 years.

Conclusion: Although the use of magnification systems has become quite widespread today, it is important to increase their use further. The procurement and use of DOMs have not created a long-term financial burden for clinicians.

Keywords: Dental operating microscope, endodontist; Loupe; Magnification systems; Postgraduate students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval for the study was obtained from Kütahya Health Sciences University Non-interventional Clinical Studies Ethics Committee (Approval number: 2024/01–04). The informed consent to participate declarations was obtained in writing from the all participants included in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of Ethics for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Clinical trial: Clinical trial number was not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the survey questions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Demographic data of the participants: (A) Participants’ title rates, (B) Gender of participants, (C) Age ratio of participants, (D) Experience of participants
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Reasons for preferring magnification systems, (B) Advantages of magnification systems, (C) Disadvantages of magnification systems
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) Clinicians’ payment system procedures when magnification systems are used, (B) How long it takes for clinicians to recover the cost of the device

References

    1. Alhazzazi TY, Alzebiani NA, Alotaibi SK, Bogari DF, Bakalka GT, Hazzazi LW, et al. Awareness and attitude toward using dental magnification among dental students and residents at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carr GB, Murgel CA. The use of the operating microscope in endodontics. Dental Clin N Am. 2010;54(2):191. - PubMed
    1. Apotheker H, Jako GJ. A microscope for use in dentistry. Microsurgery. 1981;3(1):7–10. - PubMed
    1. Carr GB. Common errors in periradicular surgery. Endo Rep. 1993;8:12–9. - PubMed
    1. Selden HS. The dental-operating microscope and its slow acceptance. J Endod. 2002;28(3):206–7. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources