Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug;168(2):326-335.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.006. Epub 2025 Feb 15.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Andrew J Franck et al. Chest. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) could potentially improve management of hyperglycemia compared with standard point-of-care glucose monitoring for critically ill patients. However, there is limited evidence to support routine use of CGMs in the ICU.

Research question: In critically ill patients with hyperglycemia, do CGMs improve time within target glucose range compared with standard of care?

Study design and methods: This was an investigator-initiated, single-center, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients admitted to a medical or surgical ICU who had diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia and were treated with insulin were eligible for enrollment. Participants were randomly assigned to have glucose monitoring performed with a CGM (intervention group) or standard of care (control group). Groups were compared for glycemic control and other relevant outcomes. The primary outcome for the study was percentage of time within the normoglycemic range, defined as 70 to 180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L).

Results: Eighty-five participants were enrolled and randomized to study groups, with 43 participants in the intervention (CGM) group and 42 patients in the control (standard of care) group. For the primary outcome, there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention group (mean ± SD, 60.5% ± 30.5%) and the control group (mean ± SD, 61.4% ± 28.3%) in time within the goal glucose range (mean difference, -0.9%; 95% CI, -13.6 to 11.8; P = .9). Except for patient satisfaction, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for secondary and exploratory outcomes.

Interpretation: The results of this study do not support CGMs as a superior method for routine glucose monitoring in the ICU compared with standard of care.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05442853; URL: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

Keywords: continuous glucose monitors; diabetes mellitus; hyperglycemia; intensive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared.

Publication types

Associated data