Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Dressing Enhances Surgical Incision Cosmesis: A Randomized Trial
- PMID: 39958717
- PMCID: PMC11828027
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006549
Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Dressing Enhances Surgical Incision Cosmesis: A Randomized Trial
Abstract
Background: Cosmetic appearance of incisions remains one of the most important aspects of the patient recovery experience. Despite advances in surgery, scar prevention is the gold standard in improved results. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy has shown promise in decreasing surgical site infection and healing time. This study aimed to assess outcomes of primarily closed surgical incisions with mechanically powered negative pressure dressings (MP-NPDs) compared with standard dressings.
Methods: This study was a single-center, within-subjects, randomized controlled trial, in which each patient served as both the control and experimental arms. Laparoscopic/robotic port site incisions were randomized to control dressing or MP-NPD. Primary outcomes were cosmetic results at first clinic visit by blinded physicians and nonphysician observers.
Results: Forty patients with a total of 80 incisions were included in the analysis. The average scores for scar spread, erythema, dyspigmentation, scar hypertrophy, and overall impression were lower for the MP-NPD wounds. The only individual variable of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating scale, in which there was no difference noted between the 2 groups, was the presence of suture marks. The average total Scar Cosmesis Assessment Rating score was significantly lower (more favorable) for the MP-NPD wounds compared with the control wounds (3.39 ± 3.18 versus 4.79 ± 3.18, respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The use of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy with the application of a novel MP-NPD over surgical incisions resulted in clinical and statistically significant improvement in scar cosmesis in the early/intermediate postoperative period according to both physician and nonphysician observers.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Young VL, Hutchison J. Insights into patient and clinician concerns about scar appearance: semiquantitative structured surveys. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:256–265. - PubMed
-
- Bell L, McAdams T, Morgan R, et al. . Pruritus in burns: a descriptive study. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1988;9:305–308. - PubMed
-
- Dorfmüller M. Psychological management and after-care of severely burned patients. Unfallchirurg. 1995;98:213–217. - PubMed
-
- Levine E, Degutis L, Pruzinsky T, et al. . Quality of life and facial trauma: psychological and body image effects. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:502–510. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources