Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 17;82(4):384-396.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263. Online ahead of print.

Temporal Dynamics and Biological Variability of Alzheimer Biomarkers

Collaborators, Affiliations

Temporal Dynamics and Biological Variability of Alzheimer Biomarkers

Jihwan Yun et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the characteristics of discordance between plasma biomarkers and positron emission tomography (PET) results in Alzheimer disease (AD) is crucial for accurate interpretation of the findings.

Objective: To compare (1) medical comorbidities affecting plasma biomarker concentrations, (2) imaging and clinical features, and (3) cognitive changes between plasma biomarker and PET discordant and concordant cases.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, included individuals with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer-type dementia, who had both amyloid β (Aβ) PET imaging and plasma biomarkers. A subset of participants also underwent tau PET imaging.

Exposures: Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their plasma and PET biomarker results: plasma-/PET-, plasma+/PET-, plasma-/PET+, and plasma+/PET+.

Main outcomes and measures: Clinical characteristics were compared between the 4 groups, focusing on the discordant groups.

Results: A total of 2611 participants (mean [SD] age was 71.2 [8.7] years; 1656 female [63.4%]), of whom 124 additionally underwent tau PET, were included. Among the plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 exhibited the highest concordance rate with Aβ (2326 of 2571 [90.5%]) and tau (100 of 120 [83.3%]) PET. The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group was older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.2] years vs 70.0 [8.8] years; P < .001) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (56 of 152 [36.8%] vs 266 of 1073 [25.0%]), diabetes (40 of 152 [26.3%] vs 156 of 1059 [14.7%]), and chronic kidney disease (17 of 152 [11.2%] vs 21 of 1073 [2.0%]) compared with the p-tau217-/Aβ PET- group (P < .001 for all). Body mass index was higher in p-tau217-/Aβ PET+ than in p-tau217+/Aβ PET+ (mean [SD], 24.1 [2.8] vs 23.1 [3.1], respectively; P = .001; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group had lower hippocampal volume (mean [SD], 2555.4 [576.9] vs 2979.1 [545.8]; P < .001) and worse clinical trajectory compared with p-tau217-/Aβ PET- (β = -0.53; P < .001). In contrast, tau PET discordant cases did not show significant differences in medical comorbidities or clinical outcomes compared with the p-tau217-/tau PET- group. Only the p-tau 217+/tau PET+ group demonstrated faster cognitive deterioration compared with the p-tau 217-/tau PET- group (β = -1.66; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that the mechanisms underlying the discordance between plasma biomarkers and PET findings may be multifaceted, underscoring the need to consider the temporal dynamics and biological variability of plasma biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Zetterberg reported receiving advisory board fees from AbbVie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZpath, Amylyx, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, LabCorp, Merry Life, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Quanterix, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave Scientific; lecture fees from Alzecure, BioArctic, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and WebMD; and being cofounder and stockholder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, outside the submitted work. Dr Blennow reported receiving consultant and advisory board fees from AbbVie, AC Immune, ALZPath, AriBio, BioArctic, Biogen, Eisai, Lilly, Moleac Pte Ltd, Neurimmune, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Siemens Healthineers; serving on data monitoring committees for Julius Clinical and Novartis; giving lectures, producing educational materials, and participating in educational programs for AC Immune, Biogen, Celdara Medical, Eisai, and Roche Diagnostics; and being a cofounder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, outside the work. Dr Therriault reported receiving personal fees from Alzheon and Neurotorium outside the submitted work. Dr Weiner reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging, the Department of Defense, the California Department of Public Health, Siemens, Biogen, Hillblom Foundation, Alzheimer's Association, Johnson & Johnson, Kevin & Connie Shanahan, GE, VUmc, Australian Catholic University, The Stroke Foundation, and Veterans Administration; consulting, travel, and/or lecture fees from Boxer Capital, Cerecin, Clario/BioClinica, Dementia Society of Japan, Eisai, Guidepoint, Health & Wellness Partners, Indiana University, LCN Consulting, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Duke University, Prova Education, T3D Therapeutics, University of Southern CA, WebMD, MEDA Corp, China Association for Alzheimer’s Disease, Taipei Medical University, Cleveland Clinic, AD/PD Congress, Foundation of Learning, Health Society Japan, Korean Dementia Society, National Center for Geriatrics & Gerontology Japan, INSPIRE Project, University of Toulouse, CTAD Congress; and stock options from Alzeca, Alzheon, ALZpath, and Anven outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Teunissen CE, Verberk IMW, Thijssen EH, et al. . Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: towards clinical implementation. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(1):66-77. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00361-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thijssen EH, Verberk IMW, Kindermans J, et al. . Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022;14(1):e12285. doi:10.1002/dad2.12285 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansson O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2021;27(6):954-963. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thijssen EH, La Joie R, Strom A, et al. ; Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration investigators . Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a retrospective diagnostic performance study. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(9):739-752. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00214-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mielke MM, Frank RD, Dage JL, et al. . Comparison of plasma phosphorylated tau species with amyloid and tau positron emission tomography, neurodegeneration, vascular pathology, and cognitive outcomes. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(9):1108-1117. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2293 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources