Buprenorphine, Pain, and Opioid Use in Patients Taking High-Dose Long-Term Opioids: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 39960730
- PMCID: PMC11833656
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8361
Buprenorphine, Pain, and Opioid Use in Patients Taking High-Dose Long-Term Opioids: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Guidelines recommend dose reduction or discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy when harm outweighs benefit, but strategies to help patients do so are limited.
Objective: To test optionally switching to buprenorphine as a strategy for improving pain and reducing opioids among patients prescribed high-dose, full agonist long-term opioid therapy.
Design, setting, and participants: In this pragmatic, multisite, 12-month randomized clinical trial with masked outcome assessment, patients treated at Veterans Affairs primary care clinics were recruited from October 2017 to March 2021, with follow-up completed June 2022. Eligible patients had moderate to severe chronic pain despite high-dose opioid therapy (≥70 mg/d for at least 3 months). Patients were randomized to having the option to switch to buprenorphine or not having the option to switch.
Interventions: The buprenorphine option was discussed with eligible patients as part of a larger trial of collaborative pain care interventions. Those who switched had structured follow-up to optimize dosing and address adverse effects.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was Brief Pain Inventory total score at 12 months. The main secondary outcome was opioid dose in morphine milligram equivalents at 12 months.
Results: Of 207 included participants, 185 (89.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.9 (10.2) years. A total of 104 were randomized to the buprenorphine option and 103 to the no buprenorphine option. In the buprenorphine option arm, 27 participants (26.0%) switched. Over 12 months, the mean (SD) Brief Pain Inventory score improved from 6.8 (1.5) to 6.1 (1.9; adjusted mean difference [AMD], -0.59; 95% CI, -0.89 to -0.29) in the buprenorphine option arm and from 6.8 (1.6) to 6.3 (1.7; AMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.81 to 0.20) in the no option arm (between-group AMD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.52 to 0.34). Over 12 months, mean (SD) opioid dosage decreased from 157 (75) mg/d to 94 (98) mg/d in the buprenorphine option arm (AMD, -61.0 mg/d; 95% CI, -74.1 to -47.9) and from 165 (88) mg/d to 107 (89) mg/d (AMD, -58.5 mg/d; 95% CI, -71.6 to -45.4) in the no option arm (between-group AMD, -2.5 mg/d; 95% CI, -21.1 to 16.0).
Conclusions and relevance: In this trial, outcomes did not differ between groups; both had small improvements in pain and substantial reductions in opioid dosage, but the proportion of participants who switched to buprenorphine was low.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03026790.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment on
-
Integrating Buprenorphine Into Chronic Pain Treatment-Putting the Choice in VOICE.JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 1;185(5):497-498. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8384. JAMA Intern Med. 2025. PMID: 39960723 No abstract available.
References
-
- Sandbrink F, Murphy JL, Johansson M, et al. ; VA/DoD Guideline Development Group . The use of opioids in the management of chronic pain: synopsis of the 2022 Updated U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(3):388-397. doi:10.7326/M22-2917 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical