Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb;51(2):353-363.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07807-2. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

Liberal vs. restrictive transfusion strategies for acute brain injury: a systematic review and frequentist-Bayesian meta-analysis

Pierre-Louis Blot  1 , Maxime Renaux  1 , Timothée Ayasse  1 , Lucie Collet  1 , Arthur James  1 , Jean-Michel Constantin  1 , Rayan Braïk  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Liberal vs. restrictive transfusion strategies for acute brain injury: a systematic review and frequentist-Bayesian meta-analysis

Pierre-Louis Blot et al. Intensive Care Med. 2025 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a liberal transfusion strategy (≥ 9 g/dL) improves neurological outcomes in adults with acute brain injury (ABI).

Method: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and trial registries for randomized controlled trials comparing liberal (≥ 9 g/dL) vs. restrictive (≥ 7 g/dL) transfusion in adults with ABI (traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage) and Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 13. Frequentist, Bayesian, and trial sequential analyses were used. The primary outcome was favorable neurological status at 180 days.

Results: Four randomized controlled trials (N = 1853; 922 liberal, 931 restrictive) were included. The pooled frequentist risk ratio (RR) for favorable neurological outcome was 0.84 (95% CI 0.65-1.09; I2 = 58%). In a pre-specified sensitivity analysis including only low-risk-of-bias trials, the results suggested a potential benefit in favor of the liberal strategy (RR 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.87]) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses for patients with traumatic brain injury or stratified by initial Glasgow coma scale were consistent with the main findings. Bayesian analyses showed that the estimated treatment effect depended on the assumptions and priors used, with an unfavorable prior derived from one trial with distinct protocol appearing less likely than neutral or favorable priors. Trial sequential analysis indicated that current evidence is insufficient to confirm a definitive effect. Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: This review did not provide definitive evidence of a neurological benefit from liberal transfusion strategies in acute brain injury. Both frequentist and Bayesian analyses highlight the influence of a single trial on the overall effect estimate and heterogeneity. However, sensitivity analyses excluding this trial and focusing on studies with low risk of bias suggested that liberal transfusion strategies could improve neurological outcomes. Future research should focus on identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit, guiding a more individualized approach.

Keywords: Brain injury; Intracranial hemorrhage; Meta-analysis; Neurological outcome; Subarachnoidal hemorrhage; Transfusion; Trauma brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflicts of interest: None of the authors reported any financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD et al (2017) Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 16:987–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sekhon MS, McLean N, Henderson WR et al (2012) Association of hemoglobin concentration and mortality in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care 16:R128. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11431 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Glance LG, Dick AW, Mukamel DB et al (2011) Association between intraoperative blood transfusion and mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 114:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182054d06 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goel R, Tobian AAR, Shaz BH (2019) Noninfectious transfusion-associated adverse events and their mitigation strategies. Blood 133:1831–1839. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-10-833988 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vlaar AP, Oczkowski S, de Bruin S et al (2020) Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 46:673–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources