Assessing blood volume returned with use of intraoperative cell salvage in adult spinal deformity correction
- PMID: 39962009
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-025-01055-6
Assessing blood volume returned with use of intraoperative cell salvage in adult spinal deformity correction
Abstract
Purpose: While multiple studies have evaluated the role of intraoperative red blood cell salvage (IOCS) in instrumented posterior spinal fusion as a method to reduce allogenic blood transfusion and its associated risks and cost, few studies have quantified the blood available for return to the patient when using IOCS. Given this paucity of data, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between estimated blood loss and cell saver volume returned.
Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective spinal fusion for correction of deformity requiring six or more levels of fusion were included. Demographic data, surgical details, EBL as measured by cell saver, and cell saver blood volume returned were recorded.
Results: 138 consecutive patients were included in the study. Average EBL as measured by cell saver across 138 cases was 734 cc. Based on patients' height, weight, and sex, the average percentage of estimated circulating blood volume lost during surgery was 15.9%. Average EBL per level was 84.2 cc.; mean percentage of total blood volume lost per level was 1.8%. Average blood volume returned was 256 cc., resulting in an average 34.9% of blood loss returned to the patient via IOCS.
Conclusions: On average, 34.9% of blood lost was subsequently transfused. While literature on this topic is very limited, this finding was similar to smaller cohorts that have examined IOCS autologous transfusion volumes. A better understanding of the available fraction of blood for return may allow providers to predict the need for allogenic blood transfusion or more clearly evaluate cost effectiveness of IOCS.
Keywords: Blood loss; Deformity; Intraoperative cell salvage.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Katherine D. Drexelius: None, Lindsey E. Miller: None, Rebecca J. DeCarlo: None, Trent A. VanHorn: None, Michael A. Bohl: None pertinent to this study/manuscript, All disclosures for Michael A. Bohl: Depuy-Synthes: consulting and education grant, MiRus: consulting, SpineWave: consulting, Dignity Health: royalties, SurgiSTUD: ownership interest. Ethical approval: IRB approval obtained, IRB 02–22-28E. Informed consent: Per IRB approval, not obtained given retrospective nature of study with no patient intervention.
Similar articles
-
Desmopressin use for minimising perioperative blood transfusion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):CD001884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001884.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28691229 Free PMC article.
-
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23302507 Free PMC article.
-
Indications and Outcomes of Cell Saver in Adolescent Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Systematic Review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar 15;42(6):E363-E370. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001780. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 27398896
-
Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):CD001888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37681564 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
References
-
- Pellisé F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M et al (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3542-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bess S, Line B, Fu KM et al (2016) The health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity: comparison of deformity types to united states population norms and chronic diseases. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001202 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Durand WM, Babu JM, Hamilton DK et al (2022) Adult spinal deformity surgery is associated with increased productivity and decreased absenteeism from work and school. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004271 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Riley MS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2018) Health-related quality of life outcomes in complex adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 28(2):194–200. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.6.Spine17357 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI et al (2016) Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Neurosurgery 78(6):851–861. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001116 - DOI - PubMed