Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 3:16:1524352.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1524352. eCollection 2025.

Association of body roundness index with cardiovascular disease in patients with cardiometabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2009-2018

Affiliations
Review

Association of body roundness index with cardiovascular disease in patients with cardiometabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2009-2018

Xiaohua He et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS), marked by abdominal obesity and metabolic dysregulation, is associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Compared to the traditional anthropometric predictors represented by body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), body roundness index (BRI) appears to provide a more accurate reflection of the abdominal fat distribution associated with metabolic diseases. Therefore, this study intends to investigate the association of BRI with the risk of CVD and its components including congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary heart disease (CHD), angina, heart attack, and stroke in patients with CMS. At the same time, we hypothesized that BRI would identify CVD better than BMI or WC.

Methods: Data from the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Logistic regression models were mainly utilized to evaluate the relationship between BRI and CVD in patients with CMS, including smooth curve analysis, threshold effects analysis, subgroup analysis and multiple imputation. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the ability of BRI to predict CVD.

Results: The logistic regression model showed a positive association between the BRI and CVD. The highest quartile of BRI (Q4) showing the strongest association with CVD. The smoothed curve revealed a linear relationship between BRI and CVD, but a U-shaped association between the BRI and CHF. For CVD, stratified analyses did not show significant difference between strata. For CHF, BMI interacted with the association, with BRI being associated with decreased risk of CHF in a subgroup of normal weight subjects and increased risk of CHF in a subgroup of obese subjects. The multiple imputation further confirmed the robustness of these results. Additionally, the ROC curve indicated that BRI, BMI and WC had predictive power for CVD and CHF (AUC > 0.05). BRI has similar predictive power to WC but better than BMI.

Conclusions: An elevated BRI is associated with a heightened risk of CVD in patients with CMS. BRI has similar ability to predict CVD and CHF as WC, but superior to BMI.

Keywords: NHANES; body roundness index; cardiometabolic syndrome; cardiovascular disease; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening flow of respondents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The smooth curve analysis between the BRI and the risk of CVD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The smooth curve analysis between the BRI and the risk of CHF.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CVD, Cardiovascular disease; WC, Waist; BRI, Body roundness index; BMI, Body mass index; AUC, Area under the curve; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 5
Figure 5
CHF, Congestive heart failure; WC, Waist; BRI, Body roundness index; BMI, Body mass index; AUC, Area under the curve; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.

References

    1. Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. . 2024 Heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of US and global data from the American heart association. Circ (New York N.Y.). (2024) 149:e347. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li Y, Cao Y, Jing Y, Liu Y, Liu Y. Global trends and regional differences in incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease, 1990–2019: findings from 2019 global burden of disease study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2023) 30:276–86. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac285 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chong B, Jayabaskaran J, Jauhari SM, Chan SP, Goh R, Kueh M, et al. . Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2024) zwae281. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae281 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. . Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, Despres JP, Gordon-Larsen P, Lavie CJ, et al. . Obesity and cardiovascular disease: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. (2021) 143:e984–e1010. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources