Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;93(6):2346-2356.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.30445. Epub 2025 Feb 18.

A data-driven approach for improved quantification of in vivo metabolic conversion rates of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Affiliations

A data-driven approach for improved quantification of in vivo metabolic conversion rates of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Yaewon Kim et al. Magn Reson Med. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate quantification of metabolism in hyperpolarized (HP) 13C MRI is essential for clinical applications. However, kinetic model parameters are often confounded by uncertainties in radiofrequency flip angles and other model parameters.

Methods: A data-driven kinetic fitting approach for HP 13C-pyruvate MRI was proposed that compensates for uncertainties in the B1 + field. We hypothesized that introducing a scaling factor to the flip angle to minimize fit residuals would allow more accurate determination of the pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rate (kPL). Numerical simulations were performed under different conditions (flip angle, kPL, and T1 relaxation), with further testing using HP 13C-pyruvate MRI of rat liver and kidneys.

Results: Simulations showed that the proposed method reduced kPL error from 60% to 1% when the prescribed and actual flip angles differed by 60%. The method also showed robustness to T1 uncertainties, achieving median kPL errors within ±3% even when the assumed T1 was incorrect by up to a factor of 2. In rat studies, better-quality fitting for lactate signals (a 1.4-fold decrease in root mean square error [RMSE] for lactate fit) and tighter kPL distributions (an average of 3.1-fold decrease in kPL standard deviation) were achieved using the proposed method compared with when no correction was applied.

Conclusion: The proposed data-driven kinetic fitting approach provided a method to accurately quantify HP 13C-pyruvate metabolism in the presence of B1 + inhomogeneity. This model may also be used to correct for other error sources, such as T1 relaxation and flow, and may prove to be clinically valuable in improving tumor staging or assessing treatment response.

Keywords: flip angle correction; hyerpolarized C‐13 pyruvate; metabolic conversion analysis; metabolic imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Proposed data‐driven kinetic fitting model for a pyruvate‐to‐lactate conversion via k PL and approach to determine k PL. Pyruvate (Pyr) and lactate (Lac) magnetizations are lost via T1 relaxation at a rate of R1 and radiofrequency pulses (flip angle θ), which are scaled by a parameter, α. (B) In kinetic fitting, the root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) values for lactate fit at varying α were calculated, and k PL was determined at α = α optimal where the lowest RMSE is observed. (C) Results of the lactate fits.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Experimental setup for animal studies with hyperpolarized (HP) [1‐13C]pyruvate. Lac, lactate; Pyr, pyruvate.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A,B) Distributions of α optimal values obtained from k PL fitting of simulated pyruvate and lactate signals (A) and k PL errors that result when α nominal (blue box plot) and α optimal (orange box plot) are used in the presence of flip‐angle (θ) errors (B). The orange dashed line represents the case where α optimal equals the true flip‐angle ratio. Simulation parameters: nominal (θ Pyr, θ Lac) = (10°, 30°), nominal R1,Lac = 1/25 s−1, k PL = 0.02 s−1, noise level = 0.1 (SNRmax,Lac = 10). SNR, signal‐to‐noise ratio.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(A–C) Median values of lactate root mean square error (RMSE; A), α optimal (B), and k PL errors (C) from the fitting of simulated pyruvate and lactate signals in the presence of R1,Lac errors and flip‐angle uncertainties. The α optimal is the value of α that leads to the minimum RMSE. Simulation parameters: nominal (θ Pyr, θ Lac) = (10°, 30°), nominal R1,Lac = 1/25 s−1, k PL = 0.02 s−1, noise level = 0.1 (SNRmax,Lac = 10). SNR, signal‐to‐noise ratio.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Average B1 + scales obtained from the axial B1 + field maps of the radiofrequency coil at varying distances through the z‐direction from the center of the coil. The corresponding B1 + field map for each data point is displayed below them. The red dashed line corresponds to the B1 + calibrated based on the peak power at 0.3 G for Bloch‐Siegert shift pulse.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Representative results of k PL fitting using α optimal and α nominal to hyperpolarized [1‐ 13 C]lactate data acquired from left kidney (first row), right kidney (second row), and liver (bottom row) in three successive experiments conducted with (θ Pyr, θ Lac) = (10°, 30°) (“underflipped”), (15°, 45°), and (20°, 60°) (“overflipped”) radiofrequency pulses, shown in (A), (B), and (C) columns, respectively. Solid red and dashed blue curves overlaid on the acquired lactate signals show the lactate fits when α = α optimal and α nominal, respectively. The red and blue markers shown in the root mean square error (RMSE) plots respectively indicate α optimal at the minimum RMSE and α nominal = prescribed (θ Pyr, θ Lac)/(15°, 45°).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
The k PL values obtained from left/right kidneys and liver regions of interest on rats injected with hyperpolarized pyruvate in six animal studies (three experiments and three controls). Each study contains three data sets with varied or constant θ. (A,B) The k PL results from using α nominal (A) and α optimal (B). Error bars represent a 95% confidence interval for the fits, and the dashed lines across the three k PL values in each study represent the mean k PL.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Ardenkjaer‐Larsen JH, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: path to clinical translation in oncology. Neoplasia. 2019;21:1‐16. doi:10.1016/j.neo.2018.09.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsu PP, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell. 2008;134:703‐707. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward PS, Thompson CB. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer Hallmark even Warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:297‐308. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larson PEZ, Bernard JML, Bankson JA, et al. Current methods for hyperpolarized [1– 13 c]pyruvate MRI human studies. Magn Resonan Med. 2024;91:2204‐2228. doi:10.1002/mrm.29875 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Autry AW, Vaziri S, Gordon JW, et al. Advanced hyperpolarized 13C metabolic imaging protocol for patients with gliomas: a comprehensive multimodal MRI approach. Cancer. 2024;16:354. doi:10.3390/cancers16020354 - DOI - PMC - PubMed