Indications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery
- PMID: 39963911
- PMCID: PMC11843426
- DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.32736
Indications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery
Abstract
Background: Relaparotomy following abdominal trauma surgery is a critical intervention associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, data on relaparotomy in trauma patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of relaparotomy-related factors on prognosis in patients undergoing relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed adult patients who underwent relaparotomy following abdominal trauma surgery at a single center between December 2016 and December 2022. Demographic characteristics, trauma-related features, and perioperative clinical findings were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
Results: Among 300 patients who underwent abdominal trauma surgery, 106 (35.3%) required relaparotomy. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9.4%. Major indications for relaparotomy included hemorrhage control, hemodynamic instability, and intestinal leaks. Factors significantly associated with increased mortality included age ≥50 years (p=0.020), female sex (p=0.031), blunt trauma (p=0.020), multiple relaparotomies (p=0.023), active hemorrhage during relaparotomy (p<0.001), and fresh frozen plasma transfusion (p=0.046). Additionally, non-survivors demonstrated significantly lower blood pressure (p<0.001) and higher heart rates (p<0.001). They also presented with decreased levels of hemoglobin (p=0.015), platelet counts (p=0.001), and albumin (p<0.001), along with elevated international normalized ratio (INR) (p<0.001) and lactate levels (p<0.001).
Conclusion: This study highlights key factors associated with mortality in patients undergoing relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery. Early recognition and optimization of risk factors, along with the management of active hemorrhage, careful monitoring of vital signs and laboratory parameters, and special attention to high-risk groups such as older patients and those with blunt trauma, may improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery.World J Surg. 2004 Feb;28(2):137-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7067-8. Epub 2004 Jan 8. World J Surg. 2004. PMID: 14708056
-
Outcomes of early relaparotomy in pediatric patients at Tikur Anbessa teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective review.BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0436-x. BMC Surg. 2018. PMID: 30445956 Free PMC article.
-
Relaparotomy: a five-year review of indications and outcome.Int J Clin Pract. 2003 May;57(4):333-7. Int J Clin Pract. 2003. PMID: 12800467
-
Mortality rate and risk factors for relaparotomy after caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07365-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40069713 Free PMC article.
-
Anaesthetic management of abdominal trauma.BJA Educ. 2025 Jan;25(1):10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.09.005. Epub 2024 Nov 22. BJA Educ. 2025. PMID: 40083964 Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Fitch CJL, Albini PT, Patel AY, Yanoff MS, McEvoy CS, Wilson CT, et al. Blunt versus penetrating trauma:Is there a resource intensity discrepancy? Am J Surg. 2019;218:1201–5. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources