Validating the MIMIC score as a predictor of successful spontaneous stone passage in patients managed conservatively for ureteric colic
- PMID: 39963984
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.70033
Validating the MIMIC score as a predictor of successful spontaneous stone passage in patients managed conservatively for ureteric colic
Abstract
Backgrounds: The MIMIC score was designed to predict the likelihood of spontaneous stone passage (SSP) in patients presenting with ureteric colic and given a trial of conservative management. The objective of this study was to determine the external validity of the MIMIC score.
Methods: Cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study that reviewed patients over a 2-year period presenting with ureteric colic who were given a trial of conservative management. Patient-factors were recorded, and their MIMIC score calculated and compared to the observed outcome. Discrimination was determined using an area under the receiver-operating curve with an AUC >0.7 considered validated and calibration using calibration plot.
Results: Three hundred ninety-nine patients were included. The median age was 49 (IQR 37-60). 79% were males. The mean stone size for successful SSP was 3.8 mm compared to 4.8 mm for failed SSP. 88% of stones passed spontaneously. The AUC was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60-0.77). The calibration plot showed an underestimation of SSP. In the lowest quintile of patients with a mean predicted SSP rate of 46%, the observed SSP rate was 74% (95% CI: 63-83%). With a higher predicted SSP rate, the MIMIC score was accurate. In the highest quintile of patients with a mean predicted SSP rate of 90%, the observed SSP rate was 92% (95% CI: 84-97%).
Conclusion: In this population, the prediction of the MIMIC score were not sufficiently accurate. There was overall an underestimation of SSP. The MIMIC score was accurate for patients who had a higher likelihood of SSP (>83%).
Keywords: MET; MIMIC score; SSP; medical expulsion therapy; spontaneous stone passage; ureteric colic.
© 2025 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Hyams ES, Matlaga BR. Economic impact of urinary stones. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2014; 3: 278–283.
-
- Scales CDJ, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 160–165.
-
- Lee M‐C, Bariol SV. Epidemiology of stone disease in Australia. In: Talati JJ, Tiselius H‐G, Albala DM, Ye Z (eds). Urolithiasis: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. London: Springer London, 2012; 73–76.
-
- Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART I. J. Urol. 2016; 196: 1153–1160.
-
- Falagario UG, Calò B, Auciello M, Carrieri G, Cormio L. Advanced ureteroscopic techniques for the management of kidney stones. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2021; 31: 58–65.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous