Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-up
- PMID: 39965041
- PMCID: PMC11827743
- DOI: 10.1055/a-2409-4916
Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-up
Abstract
Background and study aims: Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy (SC) plays an integral role in efforts to reduce colorectal cancer risk, but its effectiveness is invariably dependent on patient compliance. This study aimed to evaluate patient adherence to SC after endoscopic resection (ER) of polyps ≥ 20 mm and identify potential barriers associated with loss to follow-up.
Patients and methods: This was a single-center retrospective study evaluating adherence to SC after ER of polyps ≥ 20 mm between April 2018 to December 2021. Adherence to SC was defined as the proportion of patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with loss to follow-up.
Results: A total of 959 patients (mean age 67 years; 47.9% women) underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm (mean size 33.2 ± 13.7 mm). Nearly half of the patients (n = 478; 49.8%) were lost to follow-up. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a higher likelihood of SC non-adherence were: lack of a primary care physician (odds ratio [OR] 1.7;95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3- 2.3; P < 0.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 or 4 (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.9; P < 0.05), residence > 60 miles from the endoscopy suite (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.3; P = 0.02), being referred by a physician outside of our healthcare system (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8; P = 0.01), and lack of written follow-up recommendations on the colonoscopy report (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.4-10.2; P = 0.01).
Conclusions: Nearly half of patients undergoing ER of colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm are lost to follow-up. We identified several patient- and healthcare-related factors as barriers to SC adherence. Strategies to address these issues and targeting of high-risk populations are urgently needed to enhance SC programs.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc, ...); Endoscopy Lower GI Tract; Polyps / adenomas / ....
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest D. Yang is a consultant for Olympus, Fujifilm, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, and Microtech. D. Yang receives research support from Microtech and 3D-Matrix. M.K. Hasan is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Microtech, and Olympus. M. Arain is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus. N. Cosgrove is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus. All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Comment on
-
Surveillance colonoscopy after resection of large polyps: Can we reduce loss to follow up?Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jan 29;13:a24010777. doi: 10.1055/a-2401-0777. eCollection 2025. Endosc Int Open. 2025. PMID: 39958663 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A et al.Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:145–164. - PubMed
-
- Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Vijan S et al.Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2292–2299. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous