Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 18:27:e58744.
doi: 10.2196/58744.

Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review

Hege Vistven Stenseth et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Critical thinking is a crucial skill in the nursing profession and must be fostered through nursing education. Simulation-based learning (SBL) with technological modalities is a pedagogical approach to enhance critical thinking skills for nursing students. The use of technology in SBL to achieve critical thinking skills is diverse. No previous scoping review has systematically mapped studies on SBL supported by technology to enhance critical thinking in nursing students.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to systematically map research on the use of SBL supported by technology to enhance critical thinking in nursing students.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to the framework by Arksey and O'Malley and was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A systematic, comprehensive literature search was performed in the LILACS, ERIC, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases in 2021 and repeated in 2023 and 2024. Pairs of authors independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full-text papers and extracted data from the included studies. The data underwent summative and thematic analysis and were categorized according to the findings.

Results: In total, 4 main categories of technology applied in SBL were identified: computer-based simulations, human-patient simulators, virtual reality or immersive virtual reality, and others. The findings revealed a shift across time in the technology used for SBL to enhance critical thinking, from human patient simulators to computer-based simulations. A dominant part of the included studies published after 2018 (21/44, 48%) incorporated a combination of asynchronous and synchronous learning activities. The theoretical foundation of the studies revealed a range of scientific theories and conceptual frameworks and models. Enablers of or barriers to the enhancement of critical thinking skills in nursing students were identified within the following themes: affinity for and availability of technology, realism, accessibility, engagement and motivation, validation, return on investment, and enhanced critical thinking through SBL using technology.

Conclusions: There has been a noticeable shift in the technology and use of technology in SBL. Descriptions of the applied technology and pedagogical considerations are pivotal for comparing or synthesizing research results. There has been a trend toward a blended educational approach combining synchronous and asynchronous learning activities. User technological proficiency and the perceived quality of the technology are imperative in the development of critical thinking. Realism, engagement, and motivation play pivotal roles in the enhancement of critical thinking in technologically supported SBL. The establishment of robust theoretical foundations of research and standardized research practices will strengthen the evidence obtained from the research conducted.

Keywords: critical thinking; nursing education; nursing students; review; simulation-based learning; technologically supported simulation-based learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 flow diagram of the study selection process for this scoping review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of the applied technology in simulation-based learning to enhance critical thinking from 1986 to 2024. CBS: computer-based simulation; HPS: human-patient simulator; IVR: immersive virtual reality; VR: virtual reality.

References

    1. Von Colln-Appling C, Giuliano D. A concept analysis of critical thinking: a guide for nurse educators. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:106–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.007.S0260-6917(16)30261-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riegel F, Crossetti MD. Theoretical frameworks and instruments for evaluation of critical thinking in nursing and education. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2018 Jul 23;39:e2017–0097. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0097. https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-1447201800... S1983-14472018000100502 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gross Forneris S, Fey MK. Critical conversations: the NLN guide for teaching thinking. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016;37(5):248–9. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000069.00024776-201609000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chernikova O, Heitzmann N, Stadler M, Holzberger D, Seidel T, Fischer F. Simulation-based learning in higher education: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2020 Jun 15;90(4):499–541. doi: 10.3102/0034654320933544. - DOI
    1. Facione P. The Delphi Report. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press; 1990. [2025-02-10]. Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. https://philarchive.org/archive/FACCTA .

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources