Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5831.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90376-7.

Prediction of new onset atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction using fragmented QRS complex combined with HEART score

Affiliations

Prediction of new onset atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction using fragmented QRS complex combined with HEART score

Chengyang Zhang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study explores the predictive value of fragmented QRS (FQRS) wave combined with the HEART score for new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) following emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A regression analysis was conducted on clinical data from AMI patients who underwent emergency PCI at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between March 2019 and October 2023. A total of 509 AMI patients without a history of atrial fibrillation were included. The presence of FQRS was determined by electrocardiogram, dividing patients into an FQRS group (303 cases) and a non-FQRS group (206 cases). HEART scores were calculated at admission, categorizing patients into low-risk (30 cases), medium-risk (220 cases), and high-risk (259 cases) groups. NOAF occurrence was observed during hospitalization and within 6 months post-discharge. The study compared the incidence of various parameters and NOAF across different groups and analyzed the ROC curves for FQRS, HEART score, and their combined predictive value for NOAF. During the 6-month follow-up, 50 out of 509 AMI patients developed NOAF. The FQRS group showed higher rates of NOAF, elevated VLDL levels, more STEMI cases, and a higher history of alcohol consumption compared to the non-FQRS group. The LVEF value was lower in the FQRS group, with these differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). NOAF occurred in 12.58% of the FQRS group, compared to 5.83% in the non-FQRS group, a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). High-risk patients had a higher incidence of NOAF than those in the medium and low-risk groups (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified FQRS and HEART scores as risk factors for short-term NOAF after emergency PCI in AMI patients (OR=2.761, 95% CI: 1.227-6.217, P=0.014; OR=1.618, 95% CI: 1.148-2.281, P=0.06). The area under the ROC curve for FQRS in predicting NOAF was 0.599 (95% CI: 0.522-0.677), for the HEART score 0.657 (95% CI: 0.584-0.730), and for the combined prediction 0.691 (95% CI: 0.617-0.764). The combined prediction model had a larger ROC curve area than either FQRS or HEART score alone. The FQRS wave and HEART score can predict NOAF in AMI patients following emergency PCI. Combining both improves predictive accuracy.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention therapy; Fragmented QRS wave; HEART score; New onset atrial fibrillation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow Chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curves of fQRS wave, HEART score, and their combined prediction of short-term NOAF events in AMI patients upon admissio

Similar articles

References

    1. Mana, G. M. Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of elderly patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction aged ≥ 75 years undergoing interventional therapy [J]. J. Clin. Cardiovasc. Disease. 35 (12), 1119–1123 (2019).
    1. Lawton, J. S. et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI.Guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: AReport of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation145 (3), e4–e17 (2022). - PubMed
    1. Bi Changlong, Z. & Kandi Zhou En, etc analysis of risk factors for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization and establishment of a predictive model [J]. J. Clin. Cardiovasc. Disease. 37 (08), 731–735 (2021).
    1. YiR, Z. R. X. Relation ofc-reactiveproten and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocadialinfarction: a system aticreview and-analysis[J]. Int. JCardiol. 190 (1), 268–270 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Terranova, P. et al. Atrial fibrillation and revascularization procedures: clinical and prognostic significance. Incidence, predictors, treatment, and long-term outcome[J]. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J.7(1), 50–60 (2007). - PMC - PubMed