Associations of mucinous differentiation and mucin expression with immune cell infiltration and prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 39966658
- PMCID: PMC11961615
- DOI: 10.1038/s41416-025-02960-3
Associations of mucinous differentiation and mucin expression with immune cell infiltration and prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Background: The production of extracellular mucus and expression of mucins are commonly aberrant in colorectal cancer, yet their roles in tumour progression remain unclear.
Methods: To investigate the potential influence of mucus on immune response and prognosis, we analysed mucinous differentiation (non-mucinous, 0%; mucinous component, 1-50%; mucinous, >50%) and its associations with immune cell densities (determined with three multiplex immunohistochemistry assays or conventional immunohistochemistry) and survival in 1049 colorectal cancer patients and a validation cohort of 771 patients. We also assessed expression patterns of transmembrane (MUC1, MUC4) and secreted (MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6) mucins using immunohistochemistry.
Results: Mucinous differentiation was associated with higher densities of CD14+HLADR- immature monocytic cells and M2-like macrophages in mismatch repair (MMR) proficient tumours, and lower T-cell densities in MMR-deficient tumours. Mucinous differentiation was not associated with cancer-specific survival in multivariable Cox regression models. Higher cytoplasmic MUC1 expression independently predicted worse cancer-specific survival (multivariable HR for high vs. negative to low expression, 2.14; 95% CI: 1.26-3.64). It was also associated with increased myeloid cell infiltration in MMR-proficient tumours.
Conclusions: Although mucinous differentiation did not independently predict survival, extracellular mucus and MUC1 expression could promote tumour progression through immunosuppression.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: TT Seppälä reports consultation fees from Mehiläinen, Tillots Pharma and Nouscom, being a co-owner and CEO of Healthfund Finland Ltd, and a position in the Clinical Advisory Board and as a minor shareholder of Lynsight Ltd. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The main cohort was approved by the Regional Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Wellbeing services county of Central Finland (Dnro13U/2011, 1/2016, 8/2020, and 2/2023), the Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea), and the Central Finland Biobank (BB23-0172). The need to obtain informed consent from the study patients was waived (Dnro FIMEA/2023/001573, 4/2023). The validation cohort was approved by the Regional medical research ethics committee of the Wellbeing services county of North Ostrobothnia (25/2002, 42/2005, 122/2009, 37/2020), Fimea (FIMEA/2022/001941), and Biobank Borealis (BB-2017_1012). Patients gave written informed consent for the study.
Figures



References
-
- Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous