Outcome preferences in fidelity-adaptation scenarios across evidence-based parenting programs: A discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 39966975
- PMCID: PMC11837681
- DOI: 10.1186/s13012-025-01421-y
Outcome preferences in fidelity-adaptation scenarios across evidence-based parenting programs: A discrete choice experiment
Abstract
Background: Implementing evidence-based parenting programs often involves navigating fidelity-adaptation decisions. While research has explored various aspects of this dilemma, little is known about how practitioners' outcome preferences influence their decisions in real-world scenarios.
Methods: This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate the relative importance of five outcomes (Relationship Quality, Satisfaction, Workload Strain, Value Conflict, and Reach) in fidelity-adaptation decisions among 209 practitioners delivering evidence-based parenting programs in Sweden. The DCE presented 25 choice sets across five contextual scenarios, analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression.
Results: All five outcomes significantly influenced practitioners' choices, with Relationship Quality emerging as the most impactful (log-odds: 4.56, 95% CI [4.16, 4.91]). Satisfaction and minimizing Value Conflict showed similar importance (log odds: 2.45 and -2.40, respectively), while Workload Strain and Reach had slightly less impact (log odds: -2.10 and 1.96, respectively).
Conclusions: This study offers a novel perspective on the role of outcome preference in navigating fidelity-adaptation decisions. The strong preference for improving parent-child relationships aligns with core parenting program goals, while consideration of other outcomes reflects practitioners' holistic approach to implementation. These findings can inform the design of interventions and implementation strategies that balance effectiveness with real-world constraints, potentially enhancing parenting programs' adoption, sustainability, and impact.
Keywords: Adaptation; Dilemmas; Discrete choice experiment; Outcome preference; Parenting programs; Trade-offs.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reference no. 2021-00832) granted ethical approval for the study, including all data collection. All study participants provided informed consent. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):327–50. - PubMed
-
- Hansen WB, Graham JW, Wolkenstein BH, Rohrbach LA. Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: Results for fifth-grade students in the adolescent alcohol prevention trial. J Stud Alcohol. 1991;52(6):568–79. - PubMed
-
- Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:237–56. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
