Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 19;145(1):167.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05782-3.

The German pelvic database

Affiliations
Review

The German pelvic database

Tim Pohlemann et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. .

Abstract

The German Pelvic Group as part of the former German section of the AO-International (now AO Trauma Germany) and the German Trauma Society (DGU) represents a 34-year success story of data documentation for the optimization of pelvic and acetabulum surgery. The historical development and the corresponding course are presented. With increasing work, the initial data were integrated into the DGU Pelvic Register. It is used to record data on fractures of the pelvic ring and acetabulum with the aim to derive optimized treatment options and to gain new scientific knowledge. The register started in 2004 as an initiative of the DGU GPG. In June 2024, the DGU Board approved the upgrade of the status of the working group to a formal section Pelvic and Acetabulum Fractures as standing division of the German Trauma Society.

Keywords: Data base; German pelvic group; Lessons; Multicenter study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The initial data collection sheets 1990 with integration of a schematic pelvic x-ray: pelvic ring and acetabular documentation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The initial data collection sheets with integration of a schematic pelvic x-ray: emergency treatment and specific sacral fracture documentation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
GPG 1 with analysis of 1722 patients resulting in a detailed book on pelvic and acetabular fracture data
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Target questions and topics of the GPG 2
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Special focus on new options of acetabular fracture visualization

Similar articles

References

    1. Hauschild O, Strohm P, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Suedkamp N, Koestler W, Schmal H (2008) Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J Trauma 64:449–455 - PubMed
    1. Kodak D (2024) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodak_DCS. Zugriff 04.09.2024
    1. Letournel E (1993) The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:62–76 - PubMed
    1. Matta J (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645 - PubMed
    1. Matta J, Mehne D, Roffi R (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:241–250 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources