Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb 19;10(1):e002014.
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002014.

Prevalence of dry eye disease among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of dry eye disease among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuhao Zou et al. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder of the tear film and ocular surface instability that causes ocular discomfort and visual impairment. The increasing use of digital devices and changing lifestyle patterns have raised concerns about a potential rise in DED among children. Understanding the prevalence of paediatric DED is crucial for developing effective diagnostic and management strategies tailored to this vulnerable population.

Method: An exhaustive literature search was performed on several databases covering the period from 1 January 2001 to 1 April 2024. Prevalence estimates of DED were combined using random effects models, and heterogeneity sources were explored through subgroup and regression analyses.

Results: Our literature search identified 7309 articles, of which 41 articles, representing 42 study cohorts (48 479 participants) included in the systematic review. The estimated prevalence of DED among children was 23.7% (95% CI 18.5% to 28.9%). The prevalence of DED by different diagnostic criteria (clinical signs vs reported symptoms by questionnaire) was 16.6% (95% CI 13.7% to 19.5%; 26 studies; 27 107 children) vs 34.6% (95% CI 23.7% to 45.6%; 16 studies; 21 372 children; p<0.01), respectively. The prevalence of DED after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak was 44.1% (95% CI 25.5% to 62.7%; 8 studies; 9163 children), which was significantly higher than the 18.7% (95% CI 15.6% to 21.9%; 34studies, 39 316 children; p=0.01) before the COVID-19 outbreak. High between-study heterogeneity was noted (I2>92%). In meta-regression analysis, the prevalence of DED among children increased by 7.1% with each 10° decrease in latitude (p=0.015), and by 10.2% with each 10° increase in mean annual temperature (p=0.024).

Conclusions: DED is common in children up to 18 years of age and poses a significant disease burden. Standardisation of the diagnosis of DED in children and further study of other risk factors are needed to fully explain the epidemiology of DED in children.

Keywords: Child health (paediatrics); Ocular surface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of literature search. Reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of the prevalence of DED. DEQ-5, 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire; FTBUT, Fluorescein tear break-up time; M-OSDI, Modify Ocular Surface Disease Index; M-SPEED, Modify Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness; NIBUT, Non-invasive tear film rupture time; POSD, positive ocular surface damage (fluorescein stain); SEEQ, Salisbury Eye Evaluation Questionnaire; SIT, Schirmer Ⅰ test; SSDE, Subjective symptoms of dry eyes; TBUT, tear break-up time; TFOS, Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society.

References

    1. Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:276–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miljanović B, Dana R, Sullivan DA, et al. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:409–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uchino M, Uchino Y, Dogru M, et al. Dry eye disease and work productivity loss in visual display users: the Osaka study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:294–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiffman RM, Walt JG, Jacobsen G, et al. Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1412–9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00462-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nau CB, Nau AC, Fogt JS, et al. Patient-Reported Dry Eye Treatment and Burden of Care. Eye Contact Lens. 2024;50:259–64. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001086. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources