Facilitating high throughput collections-based genomics: a comparison of DNA extraction and library building methods
- PMID: 39972011
- PMCID: PMC11839992
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88443-0
Facilitating high throughput collections-based genomics: a comparison of DNA extraction and library building methods
Erratum in
-
Publisher Correction: Facilitating high throughput collections-based genomics: a comparison of DNA extraction and library building methods.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94879-1. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40108334 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
While DNA barcoding methods are an increasingly important tool in biological conservation, the resource requirements of constructing reference libraries frequently reduce their efficacy. One efficient way of sourcing taxonomically validated DNA for reference libraries is to use museum collections. However, DNA degradation intrinsic to historical museum specimens can, if not addressed in the wet lab, lead to low quality data generation and severely limit scientific output. Several DNA extraction and library build methods that are designed to work with degraded DNA have been developed, although the ability to implement these methods at scale and at low cost has yet to be formally addressed. Here, the performance of widely used DNA extraction and library build methods are compared using museum specimens. We find that while our selected DNA extraction methods do not significantly differ in DNA yield, the Santa Cruz Reaction (SCR) library build method is not only the most effective at retrieving degraded DNA from museum specimens but also easily implemented at high throughput for low cost. Results highlight the importance of lab protocol on data yield. An optimised "sample to sequencing" high-throughput protocol which incorporates SCR is included to allow for easy uptake by the wider scientific community.
Keywords: Biodiversity; Historical DNA; Museomics; Museum collections.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sequence capture phylogenomics of historical ethanol-preserved museum specimens: Unlocking the rest of the vault.Mol Ecol Resour. 2019 Nov;19(6):1531-1544. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13072. Epub 2019 Sep 18. Mol Ecol Resour. 2019. PMID: 31448547
-
Fast-tracking bespoke DNA reference database generation from museum collections for biomonitoring and conservation.Mol Ecol Resour. 2025 Jul;25(5):e13733. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13733. Epub 2022 Nov 21. Mol Ecol Resour. 2025. PMID: 36345645 Free PMC article.
-
Phylogenomics using formalin-fixed and 100+ year-old intractable natural history specimens.Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Sep;17(5):1003-1008. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12655. Epub 2017 Feb 13. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017. PMID: 28118515
-
A Bigger Toolbox: Biotechnology in Biodiversity Conservation.Trends Biotechnol. 2017 Jan;35(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 13. Trends Biotechnol. 2017. PMID: 27424151 Review.
-
Natural history collections as a resource for conservation genomics: Understanding the past to preserve the future.J Hered. 2023 Jun 22;114(4):367-384. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esac066. J Hered. 2023. PMID: 36512345 Review.
Cited by
-
A Computer Vision Method for Finding Mislabelled Specimens Within Natural History Collections.Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e71648. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71648. eCollection 2025 Jul. Ecol Evol. 2025. PMID: 40655453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yeates, D. K., Zwick, A. & Mikheyev, A. S. Museums are biobanks: unlocking the genetic potential of the three billion specimens in the world’s biological collections. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.18, 83–88 (2016). - PubMed
-
- Johnson, K. R., Owens, I. F. P. & Group, G. C. 2023 a global approach for natural history museum collections. Sci. 379, 1192–1194 (1979). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous