Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;47(1):2461668.
doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2461668. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

Real-world assessment of sparsentan's drug safety framework

Affiliations

Real-world assessment of sparsentan's drug safety framework

Wenjing Fu et al. Ren Fail. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Sparsentan has been approved for reducing proteinuria in adult patients with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN) at risk of rapid disease progression, yet comprehensive studies evaluating its drug safety framework are lacking.

Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports following the market release of sparsentan were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration AE Reporting System. Disproportionate analysis was used to identify previously unrecognized positive novel signals at both the system organ class and preferred term levels. Additionally, analysis on clinical priorities and subgroup analysis were conducted.

Results: A total of 504 patients with IgAN were included. Two novel system organ classes and 14 novel preferred terms were identified. Hypotension and dizziness were established as moderate clinical priority events. Males had a higher relative risk of nausea, peripheral edema, feeling abnormal, decreased blood pressure, and hypotension, while females were at greater risk for fatigue, pain, increased blood creatinine, dizziness, and somnolence. Among those aged 18-45, the relative risk of experiencing fatigue, pain, and dizziness was higher, individuals aged 45 and older had a higher relative risk of peripheral edema, decreased blood pressure, and hypotension.

Conclusions: Based on the available AE reporting data, sparsentan exhibits a favorable safety profile, with no high-priority clinical events identified. Our findings offer valuable insights to optimize the use of sparsentan and understand its potential side effects.

Keywords: FAERS; IgA nephropathy; adverse events; pharmacovigilance; sparsentan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Data processing procedures. (a) The process of screening sparsentan-associated AEs from FAERS. (b) Novel AEs associated with sparsentan were screened by excluding intersections. DEMO: the file descriptor for demographic and administrative information; DRUG: the file descriptor for drug and biological details; REAC: the file descriptor for adverse events; PS: primary suspect; AEs: adverse events.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The forest plot of the 30 positive preferred terms associated with sparsentan. ˆRecognized as AE in the drug inserts. ˇRecognized as AE in the PROTECT phase III trial. *Novel signals. aNumber of reports containing both the target drug and target adverse drug reaction. ROR: reporting odds ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plot depicting AEs in gender subgroups. (a) All positive preferred terms. *Preferred terms shared by both male and female cohorts. (b) Relative risk of shared preferred terms for different gender subgroups. aNumber of reports containing both the target drug and target adverse drug reaction. ROR: reporting odds ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot depicting AEs in age subgroups. (a) All positive preferred terms. *Preferred terms shared by both age subgroups. (b) Relative risk of shared preferred terms for different age subgroups. aNumber of reports containing both the target drug and target adverse drug reaction. ROR: reporting odds ratio.

References

    1. Rodrigues JC, Haas M, Reich HN.. IgA nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(4):677–686. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07420716. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stamellou E, Seikrit C, Tang SCW, et al. . IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00476-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Floege J, Feehally J.. The mucosa–kidney axis in IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(3):147–156. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cui Y, Zhai Y-L, Qi Y-Y, et al. . The comprehensive analysis of clinical trials registration for IgA nephropathy therapy on ClinicalTrials.gov. Ren Fail. 2022;44(1):461–472. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2048017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheung CK, Rajasekaran A, Barratt J, et al. . An update on the current state of management and clinical trials for IgA nephropathy. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2493. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112493. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources