Learning by Concordance as a Tool for Paediatric Dental Traumatology Education
- PMID: 39973229
- PMCID: PMC12006696
- DOI: 10.1111/eje.13079
Learning by Concordance as a Tool for Paediatric Dental Traumatology Education
Abstract
Introduction: A learning by concordance (LbC) tool including 33 vignettes was developed jointly by teachers from the Y and the University of X to train undergraduate dental students in paediatric dental traumatology. The aim of this work was to present a learning tool not yet described in the community of dental educators. The method was presented on two different electronic platforms to two groups of students. Different modalities were compared.
Methodology: International panellists were asked to detail their reasoning for resolving ambiguous or complex situations described in clinical vignettes. Two groups were approached: a first group composed of students new to LbC (Y group) and a second group that had already experienced this type of learning method (X group). The modalities of training management differed according to the groups: Y group used the Wooclap platform and responded on a 5-modality Likert scale, while X group used Moodle and a 3-modality Likert scale. Student volunteers were able to complete a qualitative survey about the training. The main indicator used was students' opinions and feelings about different aspects of the tool.
Results: The training was completed by 121 students, 53 of whom agreed to give their opinion on the tool. Consistent with current knowledge, we found that novices had difficulty answering a 5-modality Likert scale because of the subtle difference between two close answers.
Conclusion: This is the first study to introduce a LbC tool in dental education and the results showed a strong interest in this type of pedagogical tool, regardless of the online platform used.
Keywords: dental education; dental traumatology; learning by concordance; script theory.
© 2025 The Author(s). European Journal of Dental Education published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Charlin B., Tardif J., and Boshuizen H. P., “Scripts and Medical Diagnostic Knowledge: Theory and Applications for Clinical Reasoning Instruction and Research,” Academic Medicine 75, no. 2 (2000): 182–190. - PubMed
-
- Power A., Lemay J. F., and Cooke S., “Justify Your Answer: The Role of Written Think Aloud in Script Concordance Testing,” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 29, no. 1 (2017): 59–67. - PubMed
-
- Charlin B., Deschênes M. F., and Fernandez N., “Learning by Concordance (LbC) to Develop Professional Reasoning Skills: AMEE Guide No. 141,” Medical Teacher 43, no. 6 (2021): 614–621. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
