Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 5;27(2):euaf038.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf038.

Left atrial intramyocardial fat at pulmonary vein reconnection sites during atrial fibrillation redo ablation

Affiliations

Left atrial intramyocardial fat at pulmonary vein reconnection sites during atrial fibrillation redo ablation

Federico Landra et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: Electrical reconnections between pulmonary veins (PVs) and the left atrium (LA) are frequently responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-derived images can be post-processed to detect intramyocardial fat (inFAT) by signal radiodensity thresholding. The role of inFAT on PV-LA reconnections remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between inFAT localization at pre-procedural MDCT-derived inFAT maps from first AF ablation and PV-LA reconnections in patients with AF recurrence undergoing redo ablation.

Methods and results: We included 45 consecutive patients who underwent AF redo ablation presenting at least one PV-LA reconnection. First AF ablation pre-procedural MDCT-derived data were post-processed with ADAS 3D™ to create 3D LA inFAT maps, which were loaded into CARTO3 navigation system and merged with the electroanatomical map for reconnection site analysis. In 103 out of 156 (66.0%), PV-LA reconnection points inFAT was identified in the 6 mm diameter tag point depicted in the navigation system. When dividing the PVI line into standardized segments, those identified as containing PV-LA reconnection points (i.e. reconnection segments) exhibited significantly higher total inFAT volumes compared with non-reconnection segments (8.05 ± 6.56 vs. 5.40 ± 5.18 μL, P < 0.001). Additionally, reconnection segments showed greater volumes of inFAT components, specifically dense inFAT (0.06 ± 0.06 vs. 0.03 ± 0.04 μL, P < 0.001) and fat-myocardial admixture (7.98 ± 6.52 vs. 5.37 ± 5.16 μL, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Intramyocardial fat is co-localized with two-thirds of PV-LA reconnection points in patients undergoing AF redo ablation. Reconnection segments exhibit significantly higher inFAT volumes compared to non-reconnection segments. This proof-of-concept study suggests that inFAT may play a role in PV-LA electrical reconnections following PVI.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Intramyocardial fat; Pulmonary vein reconnection; Redo ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A.B. is stockholder of Galgo Medical. D.S.-I. and P.F.-O. are employees of Biosense Webster. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
InFAT, intramyocardial fat; AF, atrial fibrillation; PV, pulmonary vein; LA, left atrium; MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; AS, antero-superior segment; AC, antero-carinal segment; AI, antero-inferior segment; PI, postero-inferior segment; PC, postero-carinal segment; PS, postero-superior segment.
Figure 1
Figure 1
MDCT-derived 3D inFAT map. Septal view of a LA 3D inFAT map. Red areas correspond to dense inFAT (−194 to −50 HU), yellow-orange areas to fat-myocardial admixture (−50 to −5 HU), and blue areas do not harbour inFAT at all (>−5 HU). MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; inFAT, intramyocardial fat; LA, left atrial; HU, Hounsfield unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PVI line analysis. MDCT-derived 3D inFAT maps of the LA from different perspectives. A 6 mm wide band corresponding to PVI line trajectory was traced. Top-left panel: lateral–cranial view of the left PVI line; top-right panel: lateral–caudal view of the left PVI line; bottom-left panel: lateral–cranial view of the left PVI line; bottom-right panel: internal medial-to-lateral view of the left PVI line. MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; inFAT, intramyocardial fat; LA, left atrial; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Procedural workflow. Pre-procedural MDCT scan of first AF ablations were post-processed. 3D inFAT maps were imported into the navigation system for PV-LA reconnection site analysis (identification of spatial colocalization between PV-LA reconnection points and inFAT). Also, PVI line was traced on 3D inFAT maps with the aim of quantifying the inFAT volume at each PVI line segment (total inFAT, dense inFAT, and fat-myocardial admixture). MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; AF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; inFAT, intramyocardial fat; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intramyocardial fat distribution at PVI line segments. First ablation MDCT-derived total inFAT volume distribution at various PVI line segments is depicted in a proportional manner (red ≥ 7.00 μL; orange ≥ 5.00 μL, yellow ≥ 3.00 μL, white < 3.00 μL). Both right PVs and left PVs show a higher amount of total inFAT at roof, antero-carinal, and antero-inferior segments. InFAT, intramyocardial fat; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; MDCT, multidetector computed tomography; PV, pulmonary vein; AS, antero-superior segment; AC, antero-carinal segment; AI, antero-inferior segment; PI, postero-inferior segment; PC, postero-carinal segment; PS, postero-superior segment.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Total inFAT, dense inFAT, and fat-myocardial admixture volumes dot plots. Intramyocardial fat volumes comparison between reconnection segments and non-reconnection segments. Reconnection segments have significantly higher total inFAT, dense inFAT, and fat-myocardial admixture volumes compared to non-reconnection segments. InFAT, intramyocardial fat.

References

    1. Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG et al. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024;26:euae043. - PubMed
    1. Serban T, Mannhart D, Abid QU, Hochli A, Lazar S, Krisai P et al. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Europace 2023;25:euad335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, Hachiya H, Mavrakis H, Deger FT et al. Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation 2005;111:127–35. - PubMed
    1. Ouyang F, Tilz R, Chun J, Schmidt B, Wissner E, Zerm T et al. Long-term results of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: lessons from a 5-year follow-up. Circulation 2010;122:2368–77. - PubMed
    1. Cappato R, Negroni S, Pecora D, Bentivegna S, Lupo PP, Carolei A et al. Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2003;108:1599–604. - PubMed

MeSH terms