Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;81(1):2021-2047.
doi: 10.1177/10519815241305007. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature

Affiliations

Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature

Ruadh Kelly-Harrington et al. Work. 2025 May.

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).ResultsFollowing title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (n = 16) followed by primary research (n = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.ConclusionsOur review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.

Keywords: employment; leave; miscarriage; occupational groups; work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Publication dates of included records (N = 48).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Country of origin of included records (N = 48).

Similar articles

References

    1. Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe Het al. Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths Investigator Group. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet 2016b; 387: 604–616. - PubMed
    1. Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet 2021; 397: 1658–1667. - PubMed
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. The Lancet Global Health 2020; 8: e1152–e1161. - PubMed
    1. Al Wattar BH, Murugesu N, Tobias A, et al. Management of first-trimester miscarriage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2019; 25: 362–374. - PubMed
    1. Morris A, Meaney S, Spillane Net al. et al. The postnatal morbidity associated with second-trimester miscarriage. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2016; 29: 2786–2790. - PubMed

Publication types