Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature
- PMID: 39973636
- PMCID: PMC12231850
- DOI: 10.1177/10519815241305007
Workplace supports for early pregnancy loss: A scoping review of international literature
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the prevalence and impacts of pregnancy loss, there is a lack of statutory or workplace-based supports for workers experiencing pregnancy loss, especially before the point of viability. As reproductive and working ages overlap, workplaces can play a significant role in pregnancy loss experiences.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to map the available literature on workplace supports for pregnancy loss before viability.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following JBI Guidance and a pre-registered protocol. We searched eight academic databases/platforms, grey literature sources, and reference lists for eligible documents (2012-2022).ResultsFollowing title and abstract screening and full-text review, 48 records were included for analysis: 18 reports, 15 journal articles, 6 guides/codes of practice, 3 theses, 2 book/book chapters, and 4 other narrative records. Secondary research was the most common methodology employed (n = 16) followed by primary research (n = 14). Reports mainly originated from South-East Asia, while all empirical studies took place in high-income, English-speaking countries. Leave from work was the most discussed/important form of workplace support. Helpful organisational measures were also identified.ConclusionsOur review found a lack of empirical research on workplace supports and experiences of pregnancy loss. Further research is needed to understand experiences and develop and implement appropriate supports.
Keywords: employment; leave; miscarriage; occupational groups; work.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe Het al. Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths Investigator Group. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet 2016b; 387: 604–616. - PubMed
-
- Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet 2021; 397: 1658–1667. - PubMed
-
- Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. The Lancet Global Health 2020; 8: e1152–e1161. - PubMed
-
- Al Wattar BH, Murugesu N, Tobias A, et al. Management of first-trimester miscarriage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2019; 25: 362–374. - PubMed
-
- Morris A, Meaney S, Spillane Net al. et al. The postnatal morbidity associated with second-trimester miscarriage. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2016; 29: 2786–2790. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
