Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 5:12:1524335.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1524335. eCollection 2025.

Validation of the Polish version of the Functional Oral Intake Scale against flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative Functional Diet Scale

Affiliations

Validation of the Polish version of the Functional Oral Intake Scale against flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative Functional Diet Scale

Magdalena Milewska et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) is a widely used instrument for assessing oral intake in dysphagic patients. Despite its frequent use, a validated version for the Polish population has been lacking.

Methods: This study aimed to validate the Polish adaptation of FOIS (FOIS-PL) by examining its concordance with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) outcomes and the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative Functional Diet Scale (IDDSI-FDS) scores across patients with diverse clinical profiles. The primary outcome measures included the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score from FEES, pharyngeal residue quantification, and IDDSI-FDS scores. A total of 302 participants with varying clinical conditions were recruited. The cohort included individuals with head and neck malignancies, cerebrovascular incidents, neuromuscular disorders, and other dysphagia aetiologies.

Results: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and those post-thyroidectomy consistently exhibited oral food intake with a FOIS-PL score of ≥5. A strong inverse correlation was found between FOIS-PL scores and PAS scores (rho = -0.739; p < 0.001), indicating that reduced oral intake was associated with increased penetration or aspiration risk. Significant differences in FOIS-PL scores were evident across patient subgroups stratified by PAS severity (PAS ≤ 2, PAS 3-5, PAS > 5) and IDDSI levels. Lower FOIS-PL scores corresponded with more impaired swallowing safety (PAS > 5). The median FOISPL score was 5 for individuals with pharyngeal residue and 6 for those without (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability between evaluations conducted by a dietitian (FOIS I) and a speech-language pathologist (FOIS II) demonstrated high consistency (tau = 0.995; p < 0.001). Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations between FOIS-PL and IDDSI-FDS scores (FOIS I vs. IDDSI-FDS I: tau = 0.819; p < 0.001; FOIS II vs. IDDSI-FDS II: tau = 0.815; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Polish version of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-PL) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing oral intake in dysphagia. The findings demonstrate high accuracy, reliability, and validity, supporting its use across diverse clinical conditions.

Keywords: deglutition; deglutition disorders; dysphagia; fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; functional oral intake; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General functional oral intake scale -PL results distribution (N = 302).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Functional oral intake scale-PL results distribution in subgroups (N =302).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The pairings of FOIS-PL and IDDSI FDS scores.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rofes L, Arreola V, Almirall J, Cabré M, Campins L, García-Peris P, et al. . Diagnosis and Management of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and its Nutritional and respiratory complications in the elderly. Gastroenterol Res Pract. (2011) 2011:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2011/818979, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clavé P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2015) 12:259–70. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.49, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekberg O, Nylander G. Anatomy and physiology. Dysphagia. Med Radiol. 2nd ed. (2017):3–20. doi: 10.1007/174_2017_58 - DOI
    1. Fattori B, Giusti P, Mancini V, Grosso M, Barillari MR, Bastiani L, et al. . Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. (2016) 36:395–402. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-829, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Labeit B, Ahring S, Boehmer M, Sporns P, Sauer S, Claus I, et al. . Comparison of simultaneous swallowing endoscopy and Videofluoroscopy in neurogenic dysphagia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2022) 23:1360–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.026, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources