Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 14:12:29-33.
doi: 10.33393/grhta.2025.3399. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Verso un Green Health Technology Assessment: il ruolo del Life Cycle Assessment per scelte sanitarie più sostenibili

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations

Verso un Green Health Technology Assessment: il ruolo del Life Cycle Assessment per scelte sanitarie più sostenibili

[Article in Italian]
Michela Bobini et al. Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. .

Abstract

The healthcare sector significantly contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions. Among the various strategies available, exploring the integration of environmental sustainability into Health Technology Assessment (HTA) presents a potential avenue for addressing these impacts. The HTA Core Model, widely utilized by European HTA agencies, evaluates healthcare technologies across nine domains; however, environmental considerations remain peripheral and are primarily confined to certain safety-related aspects. This paper examines the potential role of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in complementing HTA to better address environmental impacts. LCA offers a systematic methodology to evaluate environmental effects across the full lifecycle of a product, from raw material extraction to disposal. Through the analysis of pharmaceuticals, telemedicine, and surgical practices, the study identifies critical environmental impacts at various lifecycle stages, illustrating how LCA could support more informed and sustainable decision-making in healthcare. These findings underscore the diverse environmental impacts associated with healthcare technologies and highlight the need for tailored strategies to mitigate them. This point of view emphasizes the importance of initiating discussions on developing a framework to incorporate environmental impacts into HTA systematically, promoting healthcare decisions that prioritize both human and environmental healths.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Goodland R. The Concept of Environmental Sustainability. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1995;26(1):1–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245. - DOI
    1. Goodland R, Daly H. Environmental Sustainability: universal and Non‐Negotiable. Ecol Appl. 1996;6(4):1002–1017. doi: 10.2307/2269583. - DOI
    1. WHO. Countries commit to develop climate-smart health care at COP26 UN climate conference. In 2021. [(Accessed November; 2024 )]. Online
    1. Howard C, MacNeill AJ, Hughes F et al. Learning to treat the climate emergency together: social tipping interventions by the health community. Lancet Planet Health. 2023;7(3):e251–e264. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00022-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pichler PP, Jaccard IS, Weisz U, Weisz H. International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14(6):064004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab19e1. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources