This is a preprint.
The Association of Neighborhood-Level Deprivation with Glioblastoma Outcomes: A Single Center Cohort Study
- PMID: 39975914
- PMCID: PMC11838752
- DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5913656/v1
The Association of Neighborhood-Level Deprivation with Glioblastoma Outcomes: A Single Center Cohort Study
Update in
-
The association of neighborhood-level deprivation with glioblastoma outcomes: a single center cohort study.J Neurooncol. 2025 Jun;173(2):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05002-3. Epub 2025 Apr 7. J Neurooncol. 2025. PMID: 40193021 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy. Though literature has suggested the association of glioblastoma outcomes and socioeconomic status, there is limited evidence regarding the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on glioblastoma outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on glioblastoma survival.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adult glioblastoma patients seen at a single institution from 2008 to 2023. Neighborhood deprivation was assessed via Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with higher ADI indicating greater neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Log-rank tests and multivariate cox regression was used to assess the effect of ADI and other socioeconomic variables while controlling for a priori selected clinical variables with known relevance to survival.
Results: In total, 1464 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 60 ± 14 years with a median overall survival of 13.8 months (IQR 13-14.8). The median ADI of the cohort was 66(IQR 46-84). Patients with high ADI had worse overall survival compared to patients with low ADI (11.7 vs 14.8 months, p=.001). In the multivariable model, patients with high ADI had worse overall survival (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.09-1.43). To account for changes in WHO guidelines, we implemented the model on patients diagnosed between 2017-2023 and findings were consistent (HR 1.26,95%CI 1.01-1.56).
Conclusion: We report the first study demonstrating glioblastoma patients with higher neighborhood deprivation have worse survival after controlling for other socioeconomic and biomolecular markers. Neighborhood socioeconomic status may be a prognostic marker for glioblastoma survival.
Keywords: Area deprivation; Glioblastoma; neighborhood socioeconomic status; survival.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations Disclosures: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article. Additional Declarations: No competing interests reported.
Figures
References
-
- Estevez-Ordonez D, Abdelrashid M, Coffee E, Laskay NMB, Atchley TJ, Chkheidze R, Fiveash JB, Markert JM, Lobbous M, Maveal BM, Burt Nabors L (2023) Racial and socioeconomic disparities in glioblastoma outcomes: A single-center, retrospective cohort study. Cancer 129: 3010–3022 doi:10.1002/cncr.34881 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Goyal A, Zreik J, Brown DA, Kerezoudis P, Habermann EB, Chaichana KL, Chen CC, Bydon M, Parney IF (2021) Disparities in access to surgery for glioblastoma multiforme at high-volume Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals in the United States. J Neurosurg: 1–10 doi:10.3171/2021.7.Jns211307 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous