Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39976732
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02779-w
Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Pediatric elbow fractures are a common injury among children. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in diagnosing these fractures. This study systematically evaluated the performance of DL models in detecting pediatric elbow fractures.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore for studies published up to October 20, 2023. Studies employing DL models for detecting elbow fractures in patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023470558).
Results: The search identified 22 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of DL models for pediatric elbow fracture detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Specificity values ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 across studies, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, with a pooled estimate of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Further analysis highlighted the impact of preprocessing techniques and the choice of model backbone architecture on performance.
Conclusion: DL models demonstrate exceptional accuracy in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. For optimal performance, we recommend leveraging backbone architectures like ResNet, combined with manual preprocessing supervised by radiology and orthopedic experts.
Keywords: Convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Medical imaging diagnostics; Meta-analysis; Object detection; Pediatric elbow fracture.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.
References
-
- Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Internal Med. 2011;155(8):529–536.
-
- Boggs ZD, Sparks C, Bland DC, Schallert EK, Kucera JN. Common pediatric elbow fractures: a radiographic review. J Radiol Nurs. 2023;42(2):204–13. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous