Radar reflectors for marking of target lymph nodes in initially node-positive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-a subgroup analysis of the prospective AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) trial
- PMID: 39976867
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07635-4
Radar reflectors for marking of target lymph nodes in initially node-positive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-a subgroup analysis of the prospective AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) trial
Abstract
Background: Surgical staging procedures of the axilla in initially clinically node-positive (cN +) breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) vary across countries. Different procedures such as axillary lymph node dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy, target lymph node biopsy and targeted axillary dissection are currently in use. To date, data on radar reflectors as a non-wire and non-radioactive technique for marking target lymph nodes are limited. The present study aims at examining the detection rate, the rate of lost markers, and magnetic resonance imaging artifacts after TLN marking using a radar reflector before NACT in the largest available cohort of breast cancer patients enrolled in the international prospective AXSANA study.
Methods: AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) is an international prospective cohort study including cN + patients managed with different surgical axillary staging techniques after NACT. Eligible patients have cT1-4c cN + breast cancer and receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients are followed up for 5 years. In the present subgroup analysis, only patients with a TLN marked by a radar reflector were included.
Results: A TLN was marked by radar reflector insertion in 158 patients prior to NACT. Of these, 136 had final surgery results available at the time of analysis, and in 135 out of these 136 patients, localization of TLN was attempted. All radar markers were successfully removed. While lymphoid tissue corresponding to the TLN was identified in 132 patients (97.8%), no lymphoid tissue was detected on histopathology in three patients. It remains unclear whether the TLN was excised in these cases or not. In 1 out of 27 patients (3.7%) who underwent preoperative MRI, image assessment was compromised due to artifacts after radar marker placement.
Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest prospective series of patients receiving a radar reflector for the marking of a TLN prior to NACT for breast cancer. Our data demonstrate that radar reflectors are a reliable tool for marking target lymph nodes before neoadjuvant treatment.
Trial registration number: NCT04373655 (date of registration May 4, 2020).
Keywords: Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Radar reflector; Recurrence; Target lymph node; Targeted axillary dissection.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: Maggie Banys-Paluchowski: Honoraria for lectures and advisory role from: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, pfm, Eli Lilly, Onkowissen, Seagen, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Amgen, Samsung, Canon, MSD, GSK, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Sirius Medical, Syantra, resitu, Pierre Fabre, ExactSciences, Menarini Stemline; Study support: EndoMag, Mammotome, MeritMedical, Sirius Medical, Gilead, Hologic, ExactSciences, Claudia von Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research, Ehmann-Stiftung Savognin; Travel reimbursement: Eli Lilly, ExactSciences, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche Hans-Christian Kolberg: Honorare for lectures and advisory role from Pfizer, Seagen, Novartis, Roche, Genomic Health/Exact Sciences, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Riemser, Carl Zeiss Meditec, TEVA, Theraclion, Janssen-Cilag, GSK, LIV Pharma, Lilly, SurgVision, Onkowissen, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo and MSD, Travel support from Carl Zeiss meditec, LIV Pharma, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Roche, Onkowissen and Tesaro; Stock ofTheraclion SA. Jana de Boniface: Honoraria for lectures for Astra Zeneca, Lily and Novartis Nina Ditsch: Advisory Boards: Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Exact Sciences, Lectures: AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Pierre-Fabre, I-Med-Institute, Merit-Medical, pfm medical ag, Medi-Seminar GmbH, Roche, Lilly, Pfizer, Gilead, Novartis, Manuscript: pfm medical ag, Trial funding: Gilead, BZKF, Other: Onkowissen, Jörg Eickeler Kongress, if-Kongress Vesna Bjelic-Radisic: Honoraria for lectures and advisory role from: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, pfm, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Sirius Medical, Pierre Fabre, Mammotome, Travel reimbursement: Pierre Fabre, Pfizer Maria Luisa Gasparri: Consultant for Merit Medical Nikolas Tauber: Honoraria for lectures and participation in advisory boards: Novartis, ExactSciences, Georg Thieme Verlag. Support for attending meetings from Astra Zeneca Marc Thill: Advisory Board: Agendia, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurikamed, Becton/Dickinson, Biom ‘Up, ClearCut, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Gilead Science, Grünenthal, GSK, Lilly, MSD, Neodynamics, Novartis, Onkowissen, Organon, Pfizer, pfm Medical, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Seagen, Sirius Medical, Sysmex; Manuscript support: Amgen, ClearCut, Clovis, Lilly, Organon, pfm medical, Roche, Servier; Travel expenses: Amgen, Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Clearcut, Clovis, Connect Medica, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Hexal, I-Med-Institute, Lilly, MSD, Neodynamics, Novartis, Pfizer, pfm Medical, Roche, RTI Surgical, Seagen, ZP Therapeutics; Congress support: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi Sanyko, Gilead, Hexal, Lilly, Neodynamics, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sirius Medical; Lecture honoraria: Agendia, Amgen, Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Connect Medica, Eisai, Endomag, Exact Sciences, Gedeon Richter, Gilead Science, GSK, Hexal, I-Med-Institute, Jörg Eickeler, Laborarztpraxis Walther et al., Lilly, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, Onkowissen, Pfizer, pfm medical, Roche, Seagen, StreamedUp, Stemline, Sysmex, Vifor, Viatris, ZP Therapeutics; Trial Funding: Endomag, Exact Sciences; Trial honoraria: AstraZeneca, Biom’Up, CairnSurgical, Clearcut, Neodynamics, Novartis, pfm medical, Roche, RTI Surgical. Other authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University Aachen, Germany (Date: April 28, 2020, Number: EK 013/20). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
References
-
- Banys-Paluchowski M, Gasparri ML, de Boniface J, Gentilini O, Stickeler E, Hartmann S, Thill M, Rubio IT, Di Micco R, Bonci EA et al (2021) Surgical management of the axilla in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients converting to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy: current status, knowledge gaps, and rationale for the EUBREAST-03 AXSANA study. Cancers 13(7):1565 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Liedtke C, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V et al (2013) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 14(7):609–618 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, Leitch AM, Kuerer HM, Bowling M, Flippo-Morton TS et al (2013) Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 310(14):1455–1461 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Classe JM, Loaec C, Gimbergues P, Alran S, de Lara CT, Dupre PF, Rouzier R, Faure C, Paillocher N, Chauvet MP et al (2019) Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 173(2):343–352 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
