Effectiveness During 12-Month Adjunctive Brivaracetam Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in a Real-Life Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study in Europe
- PMID: 39976891
- PMCID: PMC11906953
- DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00697-4
Effectiveness During 12-Month Adjunctive Brivaracetam Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in a Real-Life Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study in Europe
Abstract
Introduction: Efficacy/tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) for focal-onset seizures (FOS) in patients aged ≥ 16 years was established in randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive BRV in patients (≥ 16 years) with FOS with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in daily clinical practice.
Methods: A 12-month, prospective, real-world, noninterventional study in nine European countries (EP0077/NCT02687711). BRV was prescribed per clinical practice and European Summary of Product Characteristics. Eligible patients had never received BRV before inclusion. Treating physicians made the decision to prescribe BRV, independently of study participation. Primary effectiveness outcome: BRV retention rate at 12 months; secondary effectiveness outcomes: 50% responder rate, seizure freedom.
Results: A total of 544 patients received ≥ 1 BRV dose (mean age: 43.6 years; 52.8% female; mean time since diagnosis: 22.7 years). Patients had a mean of 7.3 lifetime antiseizure medications (ASMs) and median of 3.7 FOS/28 days during 3-month retrospective baseline. Median total ASM drug load (including BRV) was 3.0 at BRV initiation (n = 539) and 3.3 at study end (n = 314). At 12 months, 57.7% of 541 patients remained on BRV, 60.4% of 230 were responders (≥ 50% seizure reduction since baseline), and 13.8% of 269 were seizure-free since BRV initiation. Historical levetiracetam use appeared not to impact retention rate (56.6% of 320 and 59.3% of 221 patients with and without historical levetiracetam use, respectively). 36.0% of 544 patients had drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), mostly (≥ 5% of patients) drug ineffective (11.4%) and seizure (6.3%). The three most common drug-related TEAEs leading to permanent BRV discontinuation (of 544 patients) were drug ineffective (10.1%), seizure (5.1%), and behavior disorder (3.3%).
Conclusions: Adjunctive BRV was effective in clinical practice in patients with predominantly difficult-to-treat FOS, as shown by BRV retention rate of 57.7% at 12 months, which is in line with real-world retention rates for other new-generation ASMs.
Keywords: Adjunctive; Adolescent; Brivaracetam; Effectiveness; Epilepsy; Focal-onset seizure; Noninterventional; Observational; Real-world; Tolerability.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Bernhard J. Steinhoff has received honoraria for consulting from Angelini Pharma, B. Braun Melsungen, Desitin, Eisai, and UCB, for serving on a scientific advisory board from GW Pharmaceuticals, Precisis, UCB, and Zogenix, and for speaking from Arvelle, Desitin, Eisai, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Zogenix, and has received research support from Eisai, SK Life Science, and UCB. Jakob Christensen has received honoraria from serving on the scientific advisory board of Eisai AB and UCB, received honoraria for giving lectures from Eisai AB and UCB, and received funding for a trip from UCB. Colin P. Doherty has received honoraria from Eisai and UCB. Marian Majoie has received financial compensation through her institution for participating in contract research from Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Zogenix. Anne-Liv Schulz, Fiona Brock, Dimitrios Bourikas, and Iryna Leunikava are employees of UCB. Anne-Liv Schulz and Dimitrios Bourikas have received UCB stocks from their employment. Anna Kelemen has received honoraria for serving on advisory boards from Eisai and Zogenix, and has received honoraria for lectures and publications from GW Pharmaceuticals, Richter Gedeon, and UCB. Eduardo Rubio-Nazabal has received honoraria from BIAL, Eisai, and UCB for speaking. Ethical Approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee (see Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee appendix in the Supplementary Material), according to country-specific regulations. Written data consent was obtained from the patient, parent(s), or legal representative before study participation, in accordance with local regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Figures



References
-
- UCB Pharma SA: Summary of product characteristics Briviact® (Europe). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/briviact-epar... (2024). Accessed 9 July 2024.
-
- UCB Inc.: BRIVIACT® (brivaracetam) prescribing information. https://www.briviact.com/briviact-PI.pdf (2023). Accessed 9 July 2024.
-
- Biton V, Berkovic SF, Abou-Khalil B, Sperling MR, Johnson ME, Lu S. Brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled partial epilepsy in adults: a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2014;55(1):57–66. - PubMed
-
- Klein P, Schiemann J, Sperling MR, Whitesides J, Liang W, Stalvey T, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam in adult patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2015;56(12):1890–8. - PubMed
-
- Ryvlin P, Werhahn KJ, Blaszczyk B, Johnson ME, Lu S. Adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy: results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2014;55(1):47–56. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources