Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul;15(6):2977-2985.
doi: 10.1177/21925682251323277. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

Framework for Adoption of Enabling Technologies for Improved Outcomes in Spine Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Framework for Adoption of Enabling Technologies for Improved Outcomes in Spine Surgery

Sathish Muthu et al. Global Spine J. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Study DesignNarrative Review.ObjectivesWe aim to investigate the integration and impact of enabling technologies, such as augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, navigation, robotics, and artificial intelligence within the domain of spinal surgery.MethodsWe made a literature review for articles that examined the progression of adoption from initial to subsequent adopters. We also analysed the key determinants that influence adopting these technologies into clinical settings. These include cost-effectiveness, ease of integration, patient acceptance, learning curves, and availability of training resources. Based on the available data a suggestion has been made on the adoption framework for clinical utility.ResultsThese technological advancements have the potential to transform surgical practice, offering improved precision and efficiency. The journey toward widespread adoption presents challenges, which include the financial implications, the necessity for specialized training, and the complexities associated with integration. To navigate these hurdles, the study proposes recommendations aimed at improving cost efficiency, streamlining technology integration, investing in professional development, and nurturing a culture of innovation and research.ConclusionsA framework has been established for the evaluation and integration of state-of-the-art technologies in spinal surgery, thereby maximizing their potential impact on surgical outcomes and patient welfare.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; augmented reality; digitalization; mixed reality; robotics; spine surgery; surgical outcomes; technology integration; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Factors determining the adoption of technology in spine surgery and recommended strategies on managing them.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Recommendation for technological upgrade based on institutional setup. 3D, three-dimensional; CT, computerized tomography.

References

    1. Foley D, Hardacker P, McCarthy M. Emerging technologies within spine surgery. Life. 2023;13(10):2028. doi: 10.3390/life13102028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornwall GB, Davis A, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ, Vaccaro A. Innovation and new technologies in spine surgery, circa 2020: a fifty-year review. Front Surg. 2020;7:575318. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.575318 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godzik J, Farber SH, Urakov T, et al. “Disruptive technology” in spine surgery and education: virtual and augmented reality. Operative Neurosurgery. 2021;21(Supplement_1):S85. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab114 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuk FJ, Maragkos GA, Sato K, Steinberger J. Current innovation in virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(1):94. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu A, Jin Y, Cottrill E, et al. Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;36(3):351-357. doi: 10.3171/2021.2.SPINE202097 - DOI - PubMed