Comparing the impact of three-dimensional display systems and barbed V-LOC™ sutures in laparoscopic hysterectomy: A retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 39978785
- DOI: 10.1111/jog.16251
Comparing the impact of three-dimensional display systems and barbed V-LOC™ sutures in laparoscopic hysterectomy: A retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the impact of two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems and barbed versus standard absorbable multifilament sutures on surgical times and complications in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital between May 2020 and September 2024. Patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy were categorized into four groups based on imaging system (UltraHD-2D vs. FullHD-3D) and suture type (VICRYL™ multifilament suture interrupted figure-of-8 technique vs. V-LOC™ barbed suture running technique). Primary outcomes included vaginal cuff closure time and total operation duration. Secondary outcomes were mean suturing time, perceived difficulty, and postoperative complications.
Results: A total of 159 patients were analyzed. Vaginal cuff closure time was significantly shorter with 3D imaging systems compared to 2D systems when VICRYL™ sutures were used (13.85 ± 4.30 vs. 21.17 ± 5.13 min, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between imaging systems when V-LOC™ barbed sutures were used. Across both systems, V-LOC™ sutures consistently reduced suturing time compared to VICRYL™ sutures (p < 0.001). Surgeon-perceived difficulty was lower with V-LOC™ sutures, particularly in 2D systems. No significant difference in complication rates was observed between groups (p = 0.188).
Conclusion: The use of 3D imaging systems in total laparoscopic hysterectomy significantly reduces vaginal cuff closure duration and overall operative time with VICRYL™ sutures, while V-LOC™ sutures consistently enable faster procedures across both imaging modalities. These findings suggest that 3D imaging systems and barbed sutures may enhance surgical efficiency without increasing complication rates.
Keywords: barbed sutures; full HD 3D; total laparoscopic hysterectomy; ultra HD 2D.
© 2025 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Similar articles
-
Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures.JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):525-9. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736772. JSLS. 2012. PMID: 23484558 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):842-847. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1416597. Epub 2018 Mar 24. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. PMID: 29577776
-
V-Loc™ 180 suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study comparing Polysorb to barbed suture used for vaginal cuff closure.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Dec;207:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 23. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27816737
-
Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):710-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33348012
-
The use of barbed suture for laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 12. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24126257
Cited by
-
Impact of 3D high-definition laparoscopy on total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a body mass index-stratified retrospective analysis.Ann Saudi Med. 2025 Jul-Aug;45(4):243-248. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2025.243. Epub 2025 Aug 7. Ann Saudi Med. 2025. PMID: 40753458 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta‐analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(1):3–7.
-
- Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, et al. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3251–3274.
-
- Usta TA, Karacan T, Naki MM, Calık A, Turkgeldi L, Kasimogullari V. Comparison of 3‐dimensional versus 2‐dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(4):705–709.
-
- Kim SM, Baek JM, Song JY, Lee SJ, Park EK, Kim CJ, et al. The use of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(3):691–697.
-
- Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(Suppl 1):S31–S34.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical