Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 20;116(1):41.
doi: 10.1007/s00223-025-01341-5.

Fracture Risk Assessment in Metabolic Syndrome in Terms of Secondary Osteoporosis Potential. A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Fracture Risk Assessment in Metabolic Syndrome in Terms of Secondary Osteoporosis Potential. A Narrative Review

Ferah Armutcu et al. Calcif Tissue Int. .

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major global public health problem with the associated bone fractures contributing significantly to both morbidity and mortality. In many countries, osteoporotic fractures will affect one in three women and one in five men over the age of 50. Similarly, diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are among the leading public health problems due to their worldwide prevalence and burden on health budgets. Although seemingly disparate, metabolic disorders are known to affect bone health, and the interaction between fat and bone tissue is increasingly well understood. For example, it is now well established that diabetes mellitus (both type 1 and 2) is associated with fracture risk. In this narrative review, we focus on the potential link between MetS and bone health as expressed by bone mineral density and fracture risk. This narrative review demonstrates the association of MetS and its components with increased fracture risk, and also highlights the need for fracture risk assessment in patients with obesity and MetS.

Keywords: Fracture risk assessment; Hyperglycemia; Insulin resistance; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity; Secondary osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: Authors FA and EVM declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The graph represents the linear increase in the number of publications on the relationship between ‘abdominal obesity and bone health’ in PubMed between 2005 and 2024. Search query keywords ‘abdominal obesity and bone health’ (Data was extracted on 4th Oct 2024)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Primary (framed) and secondary factors in the effects of metabolic syndrome components on bone health

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) (2002) Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation 106:3143–3143 - PubMed
    1. Ebeling PR, Nguyen HH, Aleksova J, Vincent AJ, Wong P, Milat F (2021) Secondary osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 43:240–313 - PubMed
    1. Kanis J.A. on behalf of the WHO Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK, Sheffield.
    1. Leslie WD, Johansson H, McCloskey EV, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Hans D (2018) Comparison of methods for improving fracture risk assessment in diabetes: the manitoba BMD registry. J Bone Miner Res 33:1923–1930 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noubiap JJ, Nansseu JR, Lontchi-Yimagou E et al (2022) Geographic distribution of metabolic syndrome and its components in the general adult population: a meta-analysis of global data from 28 million individuals. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 188:109924 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources