Efficacy of non-surgical, non-pharmacological treatments for congenital muscular torticollis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Congenital Muscular Torticollis (CMT) is the third most common musculoskeletal condition in infancy, and if untreated can lead to significant disability. While a range of conservative treatments are commonly used in the management of CMT, an understanding of their efficacy and safety is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis, without language or discipline restriction, was conducted to address this knowledge gap.

Methods: Electronic searches of CENTRAL, PubMed, 22 other electronic databases, three trials registers and Google Scholar, were conducted for randomised controlled trials, which examined any non-surgical, non-pharmacological interventions, including but not limited to manual treatments, movement therapy, acupuncture, adjunctive therapies and physical support, in children aged 0 to 5 years with CMT. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of bias 1 tool, rated their certainty of evidence using grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) framework, and performed random-effects meta-analyses.

Results: One hundred studies (80 from China) involving 8125 participants published between 1990 and 2023 were included. Adding manual therapy to an active control resulted in short-term improvements in passive cervical rotation (odds ratio (OR) 9.79, 95%CI 4.26,22.50), passive cervical lateroflexion (OR 2.66, 95%CI 1.17,6.04), active cervical rotation (OR 3.94, 95%CI 1.08,14.35), symmetric head posture (OR 4.55, 95%CI 2.57,8.05), sternocleidomastoid tumour thickness (mean difference (MD) -2.12 mm, 95%CI -2.98,-1.26) and development of symmetrical movement (standardised MD -0.70, 95%CI -0.95,-0.45). The addition of an electrophysical agent to an active control reduced sternocleidomastoid tumour thickness (MD -2.03 mm, 95%CI -2.67,-1.39) and optimised Tuina reduced tumour thickness more than traditional Tuina (MD -1.20 mm, 95%CI -1.80,-0.59). Adverse events were uncommon but poorly reported, with 71 (71%) of studies providing no data. Study heterogeneity limited pooling of data for meta-analysis, and there was very low to low certainty evidence for all results, due to high risk of bias, small sample sizes and study heterogeneity.

Conclusions: This review found that non-surgical, non-pharmacological treatments may be effective for CMT, but the certainty of evidence is very low to low. These findings are important in informing clinical guidelines and management for CMT and highlight an urgent need for large definitive trials that address the limitations of current studies.

Protocol registration: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (No.: CD012987).

Keywords: Conservative treatment; Electrophysical agents; Infant; Manual therapy; Safety; Traditional Chinese Massage.

Fig. 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flowchart of included and excluded studies

Fig. 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements of risk of bias for each included study

Fig. 3

Meta-analyses of studies that add manual therapy to a control intervention. A passive cervical rotation. B passive cervical lateroflexion. C active cervical rotation. D symmetric head posture. E lateral head-righting. F thickness of SCM tumour. G development of symmetrical movement

Fig. 4

Meta-analyses of studies that add electrophysical agents to a control intervention. Thickness of SCM tumour at 8 weeks

Fig. 5

Meta-analyses of studies that compare manual therapy with a control manual therapy. Thickness of SCM tumour after 3 to 4 months