Body composition and checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in advanced melanoma: a multicenter cohort study
- PMID: 39980388
- PMCID: PMC12145918
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaf039
Body composition and checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in advanced melanoma: a multicenter cohort study
Abstract
Background: The association of body composition with checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in melanoma is a matter of ongoing debate. In this study, we aim to investigate body mass index (BMI) alongside computed tomography (CT)-derived body composition metrics in the largest cohort to date.
Methods: Patients treated with first-line anti-PD1 ± anti-CTLA4 for advanced melanoma were retrospectively identified from 11 melanoma centers in The Netherlands. From baseline CT scans, 5 body composition metrics were extracted: subcutaneous adipose tissue index, visceral adipose tissue index, skeletal muscle index, density, and gauge. These metrics were correlated in univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis with progression-free survival, overall survival, and melanoma-specific survival (PFS, OS, and MSS).
Results: A total of 1471 eligible patients were included. Median PFS and OS were 9.1 and 38.1 months, respectively. Worse PFS was observed in underweight patients (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.14 to 3.06). Furthermore, prolonged OS was observed in patients with higher skeletal muscle density (multivariable HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.97) and gauge (multivariable HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.998), whereas higher visceral adipose tissue index was associated with worse OS (multivariable HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.22). No association with survival outcomes was found for overweight, obesity, or subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that underweight BMI is associated with worse PFS, whereas higher skeletal muscle density and lower visceral adipose tissue index were associated with improved OS. These associations were independent of known prognostic factors, including sex, age, performance status, and extent of disease. No significant association between higher BMI and survival outcomes was observed.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
J.B.A.G.H. has served on advisory boards for Achilles Tx, BioNTech, BMS, CureVac, GSK, Imcyse, Immunocore, Instil Bio, Iovance Bio, Merck Serono, MSD, Molecular Partners, Neogene Tx, Novartis, Pfizer, PokeAcell, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Sastra Cell Therapy, Scenic, T-Knife, and TRV; has received grant support from Asher Bio, Amgen, BMS, BioNTech, MSD, Novartis, and Sastra Cell Therapy; and owns stock options in Neogene Tx and Sastra Cell Therapy. J.W.D.G. has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Servier, MSD, and Novartis. G.A.P.H. has consultancy/advisory relationships with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre and has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Seerave. P.A.D.J. has a research collaboration with Philips Healthcare. M.J.B.-S. has consultancy/advisory relationships with Pierre Fabre, MSD, and Novartis. E.K. has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Delcath, and Lilly, and received research grants not related to this article from Bristol Myers Squibb, Delcath, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre. All paid to the institution. P.J.V.D. has consultancy/advisory relationships with Paige, Visiopharm, Sectra, Pantarei, and Samantree paid to the institution and research grants from Pfizer, none related to current work and paid to the institute. K.P.M.S. has advisory relationships with Pierre Fabre, AbbVie, and Sairopa and received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, TigaTx, Philips and Genmab. T.L. has received research funding from Philips. P.M. is employed at Quantib. D.P. has advisory relationships with Novartis, Pierre Fabre en BMS and honorarium for lecturing from Novartis. Not related to current work. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Korn EL, Liu P-Y, Lee SJ, et al.Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:527-534. - PubMed
-
- Carlino MS, Larkin J, Long GV.. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma. Lancet. 2021;398:1002-1014. - PubMed
-
- Blank CU, Haanen JB, Ribas A, Schumacher TN.. The “cancer immunogram”. Science. 2016;352:658-660. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical