A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Timing of Soft Tissue Augmentation in Immediate Implant Placement: Soft Tissue Changes and Esthetic Outcome
- PMID: 39980395
- DOI: 10.1111/cid.70013
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Timing of Soft Tissue Augmentation in Immediate Implant Placement: Soft Tissue Changes and Esthetic Outcome
Abstract
Aim: To assess the impact of the timing of soft tissue augmentation on soft tissue changes and esthetic outcome following single immediate implant placement (IIP) in the anterior maxilla.
Materials and methods: Patients with a failing tooth and intact buccal bone wall in the anterior maxilla (15-25) were enrolled in this RCT. Following single IIP and socket grafting, they were randomly allocated to the control group (immediate soft tissue augmentation performed in the same surgical procedure-ISTA) or the test group (delayed soft tissue augmentation performed 3 months later-DSTA). Implants were placed with a surgical guide and immediately restored with an implant-supported provisional crown. Changes in soft tissue dimensions were assessed by a blinded clinician using superimposed STL files taken prior to surgery and at 1-year follow-up. The esthetic outcome was rated by a blinded clinician and the patient at 1-year follow-up. The study adhered to the STA-COSM (Soft Tissue Augmentation-Core Outcome Set and Measurements for implant dentistry trials) guidelines.
Results: Twenty patients were randomized to each group (control: 16 females, 4 males, mean age 57.6; test: 9 females, 11 males, mean age 54.2). The mean change in buccal soft tissue profile was -0.251 and 0.083 mm for ISTA and DSTA, respectively. The mean difference of -0.318 mm in favor of DSTA was not significant (95% CI: -0.860 to 0.224, p = 0.241). Median midfacial recession was -0.200 and - 0.350 mm for ISTA and DSTA, respectively. The median difference of 0.200 mm in favor of ISTA was not significant (95% CI: -0.210 to 0.700, p = 0.311). Mesial and distal papillary recession, Pink Esthetic Score and patients' esthetic satisfaction failed to demonstrate a significant difference between the groups.
Conclusion: In patients with an intact buccal bone wall, the timing of soft tissue augmentation following IIP had no significant impact on soft tissue changes and esthetic outcome.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05537545.
Keywords: connective tissue graft; dental implant; immediate; single tooth.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- X. Y. Wu, A. Acharya, J. Y. Shi, S. J. Qian, H. C. Lai, and M. S. Tonetti, “Surgical Interventions for Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla: A Systematic Scoping Review With Evidence Mapping,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 34, no. 1 (2023): 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14013.
-
- M. G. Araujo, F. Sukekava, J. L. Wennstrom, and J. Lindhe, “Ridge Alterations Following Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets: An Experimental Study in the Dog,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32, no. 6 (2005): 645–652, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2005.00726.x.
-
- D. Botticelli, T. Berglundh, and J. Lindhe, “Hard‐Tissue Alterations Following Immediate Implant Placement in Extraction Sites,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31, no. 10 (2004): 820–828, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2004.00565.x.
-
- J. Cosyn and J. Blanco, “EAO Position Paper: Immediate Implant Placement: Managing Hard and Soft Tissue Stability From Diagnosis to Prosthetic Treatment,” International Journal of Prosthodontics 36, no. 5 (2023): 533–545, https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8544.
-
- L. Seyssens, C. Eeckhout, and J. Cosyn, “Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Socket Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 24, no. 3 (2022): 339–351, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13079.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
