Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 20;17(2):e79375.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.79375. eCollection 2025 Feb.

The Impact of Mobile Health (mHealth) Apps on Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Mobile Health (mHealth) Apps on Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Paraskevi Giaxi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) poses a significant health risk for pregnant women, as it is associated with an increased likelihood of developing type II diabetes and cardiovascular complications. In addition, there is a high risk for pregnancy-related complications, emphasizing the need for effective management of GDM. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of mHealth applications on gestational diabetes-related outcomes. A systematic review was conducted, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using the following search terms: (smartphone* OR mobile OR mHealth OR "mobile health") AND ("gestational diabetes" OR "maternal diabetes" OR "pregnancy diabetes" OR "pregnancy-induced diabetes" OR "perinatal diabetes"). In order to be included in the systematic review, the studies had to be papers published in peer-reviewed journals, published from February 2, 2020 to February 2, 2025, in the English language, being randomized trials, evaluating the impact of mHealth apps on women with GDM, excluding studies that incorporated additional technological interventions (e.g., WeChat supportive groups). The extracted data were the following: authors, country, total and per group number of participants, participants' characteristics, interventional content, assessments, time of the assessments, results, and potential information about participant adherence. The Jadad Scale was used for quality evaluation. Six studies met the predefined criteria and were included in the systematic review. Three studies found no or minimal benefits from the use of such applications. One study demonstrated highly significant benefits, not only in the management of GDM but also in reducing pregnancy-related complications. Another study indicated greater adherence to treatment and fewer admissions to neonatal intensive care units, while a third study reported a shift toward better postpartum health behaviors, which was closely associated with the use of mHealth applications, suggesting that those apps could support women in adopting healthier habits after childbirth. All studies reporting positive outcomes were carried out in Eastern Asian Countries (Singapore and China), whereas studies conducted in Europe found minimal or no benefits. The score on the Jadad Scale ranged from 2 to 3, indicating moderate to low quality. Οverall, while some promising findings were observed, further research is essential to evaluate these apps more thoroughly and enhance their effectiveness. Greater culturally influenced adherence to healthcare instructions leads to more significant benefits for Asian women with GDM. Cultural factors should be carefully considered when designing and implementing mHealth applications for women with GDM.

Keywords: diabetes gestational; intelligent systems; mobile apps (mhealth); pregnancy; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Selection process for the included studies

Similar articles

References

    1. Increased risk of type II diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease after gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Hopmans TE, Van Houten C, Kasius A, et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:8043. - PubMed
    1. Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kramer CK, Campbell S, Retnakaran R. Diabetologia. 2019;62:905–914. - PubMed
    1. The association between gestational diabetes mellitus and cancer in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Wang Y, Yan P, Fu T, Yuan J, Yang G, Liu Y, Zhang ZJ. Diabetes Metab. 2020;46:461–471. - PubMed
    1. Gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia: correlation and influencing factors. Yang Y, Wu N. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:831297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Preeclampsia and diabetes. Weissgerber TL, Mudd LM. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15:9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources