Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 28:33:100717.
doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100717. eCollection 2025 Jan.

A simplified online adaptive workflow for long-course magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in esophageal cancer

Affiliations

A simplified online adaptive workflow for long-course magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in esophageal cancer

Koen M Kuijer et al. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enables high-precision radiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients but is less feasible due to long on-table times in combination with long-course treatment. In this study, we conducted an in-silico assessment of a simplified online adaptive workflow, Adapt-To-Shape-lite (ATS-lite), in which deformable propagated contours are not modified, and assessed its feasibility.

Materials and methods: The ATS-lite workflow was simulated for all fractions of nine esophageal cancer patients who had previously received full online adaptive MRgRT with manual contour corrections if needed. The deformable propagated contours were not adjusted. A dose of 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions was prescribed. Intra- and interfraction dose accumulation were performed to evaluate target coverage per fraction and across the entire treatment. For individual fractions, coverage of the manually corrected clinical target volume (CTV) was considered adequate if V95% > 98 % and V90% > 99.5 %. Feasibility was assessed by recording treatment times in the first patients treated with ATS-lite.

Results: The ATS-lite workflow provided adequate target coverage over the entire treatment for all patients, with sufficient coverage in 90% of the 177 fractions analyzed. Closer inspection revealed that inadequate target coverage in individual fractions was primarily attributed to enlargement of the manually corrected CTV, rather than poor contour propagation in the ATS-lite workflow. In seven patients, the ATS-lite workflow achieved a median time per fraction of 23 min.

Conclusions: The ATS-lite workflow provides adequate target coverage and is feasible for online adaptive MRgRT in long-course esophageal cancer treatments.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; MR-guided radiotherapy; MR-linac; Online adaptive radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic overview of the in-silico assessment for the ATS-lite workflow. For each fraction, the clinical target volume of the ATS-lite workflow simulation (CTVATS-lite), expanded with the planning target volume margin, was used for treatment plan optimization. The planned dose distribution was convolved with the 3D tumor motion trajectory to derive the estimated delivered dose distribution. Individual fraction coverage by the estimated delivered dose distribution was evaluated for the manually corrected CTV during the clinical ATS procedure of that fraction (CTVATS). Interfraction dose warping to the pre-treatment reference scan was performed to estimate the total treatment dose. Target coverage across the entire treatment was evaluated based on the pre-treatment CTV (CTVORG). The full-ATS workflow simulation followed the same methodology, except for the evaluation of CTVATS coverage in individual fraction.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of fractions with inadequate coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV) defined in the clinical ATS procedure (CTVATS) for patients 2 (top), 8 (middle), and 3 (bottom). For each fraction, the unadjusted propagated CTV on which the treatment plan was optimized (CTVATS-lite, orange) and the CTVATS (blue) are depicted on the online MRI (left) and the estimated delivered dose distribution (middle). The reference MRI (right) shows the reference CTV used for deformable contour propagation (CTVORG, green). Notable differences between the CTVORG and the CTVATS can be observed for all three fractions.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Median duration of each step in the ATS-lite workflow for online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients (n = 132 fractions). IQR: interquartile range.

References

    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, Steyerberg EW, Henegouwen MI van B, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088. - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann L., Poulsen P.R., Ravkilde T., Bertholet J., Kruhlikava I., Helbo B.L., et al. Setup strategies and uncertainties in esophageal radiotherapy based on detailed intra- and interfractional tumor motion mapping. Radiother Oncol. 2019;136:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Voncken F.E.M., Nakhaee S., Stam B., Wiersema L., Vollenbrock S.E., van Dieren J.M., et al. Quantification of Esophageal Tumor Motion and Investigation of Different Image-Guided Correction Strategies. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boekhoff M., Defize I., Borggreve A., van Hillegersberg R., Kotte A., Lagendijk J., et al. An in-silico assessment of the dosimetric benefits of MR-guided radiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2021;162:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hunt A., Hansen V.N., Oelfke U., Nill S., Hafeez S. Adaptive Radiotherapy Enabled by MRI Guidance. Clin Oncol. 2018;30:711–719. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources