Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 1;241(3):370-378.
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001362. Epub 2025 Aug 14.

New Surgical Frailty Scoring Tool: Modified 4-Factor Functional Frailty Index

Affiliations

New Surgical Frailty Scoring Tool: Modified 4-Factor Functional Frailty Index

Alexandra Z Agathis et al. J Am Coll Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty is the age-related decline in functional reserve, resulting in physical and disease vulnerability. The established 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), based on the NSQIP database, is predictive but does not encompass core components of frailty-namely physical abilities, cognitive status, and nutrition. Therefore, we sought to establish a scoring index more indicative of the frailty phenotype.

Study design: Our retrospective study included patients 75 years of age or older, from NSQIP 2021 to 2022. The modified 4-factor functional frailty index (mFF-4) is calculated by summing each present variable: previous falls, dementia, low BMI, and nonindependent functional status. Patients were stratified into frailty levels: none (mFF-4 = 0), intermediate (mFF-4 = 1), and high (mFF-4 = 2+). Area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion values assessed predictability relative to the reference mFI-5. Odds ratios (ORs) for 30-day outcomes were calculated using logistic regression.

Results: The sample included 265,041 patients. The median age was 79 years (interquartile range 77 to 84 years). The mFF-4 AUCs were consistently higher than mFI-5; mFF-4 AUCs were 0.8679 for mortality, 0.7298 for postoperative complications, and 0.7645 for geriatric outcomes. Delta (Akaike information criteria) values exceeded 2, favoring mFF-4 models. Compared with nonfrail, mFF-4 = 2+ had increased odds of mortality (OR 2.47, 95% CI 2.31 to 2.63), postoperative complications (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.43), and geriatric outcomes (OR 4.54, 95% CI 4.30 to 4.79).

Conclusions: The new mFF-4 scoring tool embodies the true frailty phenotype to accurately predict 30-day outcomes across surgical subspecialties and the overall population. It can serve as a new NSQIP "frailty" definition while also providing a framework for surgeons and patients alike to conceptualize the elevated risks it poses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M146–M156.
    1. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:901–908.
    1. Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women’s health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:262–266.
    1. Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP data. J Am Coll Surg 2018;226:173–181.e8.
    1. Xue QL. The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin Geriatr Med 2011;27:1–15.

LinkOut - more resources