Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;73(5):1491-1497.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.19389. Epub 2025 Feb 21.

Application of an Electronic Frailty Index to Identify High-Risk Older Adults Using Electronic Health Record Data

Affiliations

Application of an Electronic Frailty Index to Identify High-Risk Older Adults Using Electronic Health Record Data

Bharati Kochar et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Measurement of frailty is limited in clinical practice. Existing electronic frailty indices (eFIs) are derived from routine primary care encounters, with near-complete health condition capture. We aimed to develop an eFI from routinely collected clinical data and evaluate its performance in older adults without complete health condition capture.

Methods: Using Electronic Health Record (EHR) data from an integrated regional health system, we created a cohort of patients who were ≥ 60 years on January 1, 2017 with two outpatient encounters in 3 years prior or one outpatient encounter in 2 years prior. We developed an eFI based on 31 age-related deficits identified using diagnostic and procedure codes. Frailty status was categorized as robust (eFI < 0.1), prefrail (0.1-0.2), frail (0.2-0.3), and very frail (> 0.3). We estimated cumulative incidence of mortality, acute care visits and readmissions by frailty, and fit Cox proportional hazards models. We repeated analyses in a sub-cohort of patients who receive primary care in the system.

Results: Among 518,449 patients, 43% were male with a mean age of 72 years; 73% were robust, 16% were pre-frail, 7% were frail, and 4% were very frail. Very frail older adults had a significantly higher risk for mortality (HR: 4.1, 95% CI: 4.0-4.3), acute care visits (HR: 5.5, 95% CI: 5.4-5.6), and 90-day readmissions (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 2.1-2.2) than robust older adults. In a primary care sub-cohort, while prevalence of deficits was higher, associations with outcomes were similar.

Conclusions: This eFI identified older adults at increased risk for adverse health outcomes even when data from routine primary care visits were not available. This tool can be integrated into EHRs for frailty assessment at scale.

Keywords: aging; frailty; geriatrics; health systems; risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement:

BK: consulting fees for Pfizer, Inc & Bristol-Meyers Squibb, relationships ended

NJ: Dr. Nelia Jain is now affiliated with Devoted Health, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA

The remaining authors have nothing to declare

References

    1. Chen X, Mao G, Leng S. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2014:433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet 2019;394:1365–1375. - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013;381:752–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Theou O, Walston J, Rockwood K. Operationalizing Frailty Using the Frailty Phenotype and Deficit Accumulation Approaches: S. Karger AG, 2015:66–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing 2016;45:353–60. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources