Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0316989.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316989. eCollection 2025.

A systematic review of automated hyperpartisan news detection

Affiliations

A systematic review of automated hyperpartisan news detection

Michele Joshua Maggini et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Hyperpartisan news consists of articles with strong biases that support specific political parties. The spread of such news increases polarization among readers, which threatens social unity and democratic stability. Automated tools can help identify hyperpartisan news in the daily flood of articles, offering a way to tackle these problems. With recent advances in machine learning and deep learning, there are now more methods available to address this issue. This literature review collects and organizes the different methods used in previous studies on hyperpartisan news detection. Using the PRISMA methodology, we reviewed and systematized approaches and datasets from 81 articles published from January 2015 to 2024. Our analysis includes several steps: differentiating hyperpartisan news detection from similar tasks, identifying text sources, labeling methods, and evaluating models. We found some key gaps: there is no clear definition of hyperpartisanship in Computer Science, and most datasets are in English, highlighting the need for more datasets in minority languages. Moreover, the tendency is that deep learning models perform better than traditional machine learning, but Large Language Models' (LLMs) capacities in this domain have been limitedly studied. This paper is the first to systematically review hyperpartisan news detection, laying a solid groundwork for future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram.
The Flow Diagram illustrates the steps during document collection and evaluation. We skimmed more than 1553 papers and finally we selected a subset of 81.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The bar chart illustrates the trend of the selected publications over time.
Fig 3
Fig 3. The pie chart shows the main publishers for the selected papers.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Language distribution in the datasets described in Table 8.

References

    1. Falkenbach M, Bekker M, Greer SL. Do parties make a difference? A review of partisan effects on health and the welfare state. Eur J Public Health 2020;30(4):673–82. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz133 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellger F. The mobilizing effect of party system polarization. Evidence from Europe. Comparat Politic Stud 2023;57(8):1310–38. doi: 10.1177/00104140231194059 - DOI
    1. Dalton RJ. Modeling ideological polarization in democratic party systems. Elector Stud. 2021;72102346. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102346 - DOI
    1. Lorenz-Spreen P, Oswald L, Lewandowsky S, Hertwig R. A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nat Hum Behav 2023;7(1):74–101. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guess AM, Barberó P, Munzert S, Yang J. The consequences of online partisan media. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118(14):e2013464118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013464118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources