Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 21:9:e64087.
doi: 10.2196/64087.

Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Cross-Cultural Mental Health Recovery Research

Affiliations

Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Cross-Cultural Mental Health Recovery Research

Yasuhiro Kotera et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how critical discourse analysis (CDA) frameworks can be used in cross-cultural mental health recovery research. CDA is a qualitative approach that critically appraises how language contributes to producing and reinforcing social inequalities. CDA regards linguistic productions as reflecting, consciously or unconsciously, the narrators' understandings of, or attitudes about, phenomena. Mental health recovery research aims to identify and address power differentials, making CDA a potentially relevant approach. However, CDA frameworks have not been widely applied to mental health recovery research. We adapted established CDA frameworks to our cross-cultural mental health recovery study. The adapted methodology comprises (1) selecting discourses that indicate positive changes and (2) considering sociocultural practices informed by relevant cultural characteristics identified in our previous research, without placing value judgments. Our adapted framework can support cross-cultural mental health recovery research that uses CDA.

Keywords: CDA; analysis; critical discourse analysis; cross-cultural mental health recovery research; discourse; framework; inequalities; language; linguistic analysis; linguistic expressions; mental health; qualitative analytical approach; recovery research; social inequalities; social inequality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London, England: Routledge; 2010.
    1. Fairclough N. Language and Power. 3rd ed. London, England: Routledge; 2014.
    1. Demjén Z, Atkins S, Semino E. Researching Language and Health. London: Routledge; 2023.
    1. Karaminis T, Gabrielatos C, Maden-Weinberger U, Beattie G. Portrayals of autism in the British press: a corpus-based study. Autism. 2023;27(4):1092–1114. doi: 10.1177/13623613221131752. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13623613221131752?url_ver=Z... - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balfour J. Representing Schizophrenia in the Media. London, England: Routledge; 2023.

LinkOut - more resources